From dick.hendrickson@att.net  Tue Jul 11 17:37:32 2000
Received: from mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.50])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA51858
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dick.hendrickson@att.net)
Received: from att.net ([12.75.129.240]) by mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with ESMTP
          id <20000711153701.TJRC1605.mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net@att.net>
          for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:37:01 +0000
Message-ID: <396B3F89.157A90A0@att.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:38:49 -0500
From: Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@att.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1864) WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 95 interpretations, part 
 2
References: <200007041713.TAA26212@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



John Reid wrote:
> 
> Dear WG5 members,
> 

> The following Fortran 95 interpretations are being balloted:
> 
> Yes    No    Number     Title
> 
> -x-    ---   F90/000100 ASSOCIATED intrinsic and zero-sized objects
> 
> -x-    ---   F90/000179 DO variable with POINTER attribute
> 
> -x-    ---   F90/000185 What is the allocation status of an array
>                         after an allocation failure?
> 
> -x-    ---   F90/000194 Statements between SELECT CASE and CASE
> 
Dick Hendrickson
