From ljdickey@math.uwaterloo.ca  Mon Jul 10 15:05:49 2000
Received: from math.uwaterloo.ca (ljdickey@math.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.140.144])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA47379;
	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 15:05:49 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ljdickey@math.uwaterloo.ca)
Received: (from ljdickey@localhost)
	by math.uwaterloo.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA30927;
	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lee Dickey <ljdickey@math.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-Id: <200007101305.JAA30927@math.uwaterloo.ca>
To: Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk, sc22@dkuug.dk, sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re:  (SC22.1442) Lawrie Schonfelder

Thank you for the news about Lawrie.  I appreciate knowing about this.

I am writing to you about another matter.
 
The APL standard for APL Extended got bogged down a couple of
years ago and our time limit ran out.

This year, we submitted the document for re-registration, and
have since made corrections in preparation for submission of
the final document.

The final vote has been postponed at the request of the UK
delegation. 

This document is worthy of support, and it had significant
UK input in its preparation  (David Ziemann was the major
contributor.)

I would appreciate your support for this document, if you
can see your way clear to give it.

Since the UKs APL Working Group is no longer meeting, the
APLers in the UK no longer have a voice, but there are still
significant users there.

Your good word might tip the scales in favour of the
document moving forward.

Lee




> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:22:12 +0200
> From: "Thommen-Vidale Laura" <thommen@iso.ch>
> To: Lee Dickey <ljdickey@math.uwaterloo.ca>,
>         Marisa Peacock <mpeacock@ansi.org>
> CC: Brannon Keith <brannon@iso.ch>, Atlab Abdelali <atlab@iso.ch>,
>         Hops Brenda <hops@iso.ch>
> Subject: Re: DIS 13751
> 
> I've just been informed that the voting period for this document was
> extended until 2000-07-16 due to a request from the UK.
> 
> 
> Laura Thommen-Vidale wrote:
> 
> > Lee,
> >
> > I believe you should be informed of the voting result via SC 22 as the
> > voting results are sent to the SC secretariat.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Laura
> >
> > Lee Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > Have I missed the announcment concerning the voting for DIS 13751?
> > >
> > > I thought that they would be announced by now.
> > > Who announces these results?
> > >
> > > :wq
> > > Lee Dickey
> 
>