From whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com  Thu Jul  6 20:43:23 2000
Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA33281
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:43:13 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com)
Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id 2990282D; Thu,  6 Jul 2000 14:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bugsy (bugsy.zko.dec.com [16.31.64.14])
	by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4E6FB04
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Thu,  6 Jul 2000 14:42:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:40:51 -0400
Message-Id: <00070614405091@bugsy.zko.dec.com>
From: whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com (Stan Whitlock (603)884-2011 ZKO2-3/N30)
To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 95 interpretations, part 2
X-VMS-To: SC22WG5@DKUUG.DK,CC

Here are my votes on the following Fortran 95 interpretations that
are being balloted: 

Yes    No    Number     Title

-Y-    ---   F90/000100 ASSOCIATED intrinsic and zero-sized objects

-Y-    ---   F90/000179 DO variable with POINTER attribute

-Y-    ---   F90/000185 What is the allocation status of an array 
                        after an allocation failure?

-Y-    ---   F90/000194 Statements between SELECT CASE and CASE

/Stan Whitlock
 Compaq Computer Corporation