From Charles.M.North@rose-hulman.edu Thu Jul 6 14:25:55 2000 Received: from postal (postal.rose-hulman.edu [137.112.11.153]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA32404 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:25:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Charles.M.North@rose-hulman.edu) Received: from rose-hulman.edu ([137.112.4.125]) by postal.rose-hulman.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #44625) with ESMTPA id <0FX900L3YZUZ48@postal.rose-hulman.edu> for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Thu, 06 Jul 2000 07:25:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 07:25:55 -0500 From: Charles M North Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1864) WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 95 interpretations, part 2 To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Message-id: <39647AD3.AAEFE56F@rose-hulman.edu> Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: <200007041713.TAA26212@dkuug.dk> John Reid wrote: > > The following Fortran 95 interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > > -y- --- F90/000100 ASSOCIATED intrinsic and zero-sized objects > > -y- --- F90/000179 DO variable with POINTER attribute > > -y- --- F90/000185 What is the allocation status of an array > after an allocation failure? > > -y- --- F90/000194 Statements between SELECT CASE and CASE > Mallory North