From U9346503@Queens-Belfast.AC.UK Mon May 22 18:48:42 2000 Received: from mailhub2.qub.ac.uk (jeremiah.qub.ac.uk [143.117.14.29]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA60553 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 18:48:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from U9346503@Queens-Belfast.AC.UK) Received: from namtar.qub.ac.uk by mailhub2.qub.ac.uk with SMTP-QUB (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 May 2000 16:48:15 +0000 Received: from cladagh.cs.qub.ac.uk (cladagh.cs.qub.ac.uk [143.117.5.26]) by namtar.qub.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA18843 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 17:48:12 +0100 (BST) From: Niki Reid Reply-To: u9346503@qub.ac.uk To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1796) Use of Word to distribute documents In-Reply-To: <200005221523.RAA60062@dkuug.dk> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 17:50:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Priority: NORMAL X-Mailer: Simeon for Win32 Version 4.1.5 Build (43) X-Authentication: IMSP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII > > Word is currently used to distribute some SC22 documents and I am > > objecting. Here is a short paper for the meeting in Japan in September. > > Does anyone have any comments? PDF would certainly be my choice of the way to go for portability, with apparent ease of passing it through the pipeline. Niki