From maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov Mon May 22 18:30:00 2000 Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA60498 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 18:29:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP; Mon, 22 May 2000 09:28:50 -0700 Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.129.8]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 35-62055U1500L100S0V35) with ESMTP id gov for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 09:28:45 -0700 Received: (from maine@localhost) by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA09305; Mon, 22 May 2000 09:28:39 -0700 From: Richard Maine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14633.24631.220843.296121@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:28:39 -0700 (PDT) To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: (SC22WG5.1795) Use of Word to distribute documents In-Reply-To: <200005221437.QAA59819@dkuug.dk> References: <200005221437.QAA59819@dkuug.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid John Reid writes: > Word is currently used to distribute some SC22 documents and I am > objecting. Here is a short paper for the meeting in Japan in September. > Does anyone have any comments? My only comment is that I emphatically support your position, for whatever that might be worth (probably not a lot). -- Richard Maine maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov