From maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov Fri Mar 31 19:02:14 2000 Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA31070 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:02:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:01:41 -0800 Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.129.8]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 35-62055U1500L100S0V35) with ESMTP id gov for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:01:41 -0800 Received: (from maine@localhost) by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA01079; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:02:29 -0800 From: Richard Maine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14564.55844.965107.501605@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:02:28 -0800 (PST) To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: (SC22WG5.1765) Second revision of proposal for Interpretation 001 In-Reply-To: <200003311611.SAA30919@dkuug.dk> References: <200003311422.QAA30578@dkuug.dk> <200003311611.SAA30919@dkuug.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid Craig T. Dedo writes: > 1. Are you taking ownership of this particular interpretation? I was not aware that interps were "owned". See paper J3/00-142 for the interp process. > 4. Should we have a straw vote, either by e-mail or at the next J3 meeting on > the questions in item 2 and 3? Heavens no. Those questions were not asked in the interp. They are addressed by the existing standard text, and I know of no ambiguities or misreadings of the existing text in this regard. John's answer goes exactly far enough. He answers the interp question and he proposes an edit to make the standard unambiguous (or to at least clarify). He does not then go try to redesign implied DO loops. -- Richard Maine maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov