From whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com  Wed Nov 24 17:38:58 1999
Received: from mailext04.compaq.com (mailext04.compaq.com [207.18.199.42])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA67626
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:38:57 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com)
Received: from mailint02.im.hou.compaq.com (mailint02.compaq.com [207.18.199.35])
	by mailext04.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B75104E96
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:40:29 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mailint02.im.hou.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id 933FCBC4CE; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:40:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from bugsy (bugsy.zko.dec.com [16.31.64.14])
	by mailint02.im.hou.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3328EB2A42
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:40:19 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:40:47 -0500
Message-Id: <99112411404780@bugsy.zko.dec.com>
From: whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com (Stan Whitlock (603)884-2011 ZKO2-3/N30)
To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re:  (SC22WG5.1666) Structure of the WG5 archive
X-VMS-To: SC22WG5@DKUUG.DK

John,

I still prefer PostScript to PDF although I can deal with PDF.

Just my 2 pence			/Stan

********************************************************************************

From:	SMTP%"J.Reid@letterbox.rl.ac.uk" 24-NOV-1999 11:34:38.86
To:	SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subj:	(SC22WG5.1666) Structure of the WG5 archive

Dear WG5,
	Adding a new document to the ftp server has made me think about
its structure, and I am considering changes.

For SD1, the Complete Document Register, I have mounted a text version
and I propose to discard the PostScript and PDF versions.

I am considering mounting no more PostScript versions, relying instead
on PDF.

I am considering moving the contents of each Acrobat, PostScript, or
Text directory into its host. This will make it easier to see which
versions of any particular document are available.

Does anyone have any comments on such changes?

Best wishes,

John.