From E.W.Kruyt@Physiology.Medfac.LeidenUniv.nl Wed Nov 11 10:14:56 1998 Received: from rullf2.MedFac.LeidenUniv.nl (rullf2.MedFac.LeidenUniv.nl [132.229.167.11]) by dkuug.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA26924 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:14:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from E.W.Kruyt@Physiology.Medfac.LeidenUniv.nl) Received: from rulfyn (rulfyn.MedFac.LeidenUniv.nl) by rullf2.medfac.leidenuniv.nl (PMDF V5.1-8 #20174) with SMTP id <01J41L69EPZG8WWEP8@rullf2.medfac.leidenuniv.nl> for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:16:07 MET Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:14:10 +0100 From: "Erik W. Kruyt" Subject: EXTERNAL, INTRINSIC To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Reply-to: E.W.Kruyt@Physiology.Medfac.LeidenUniv.nl Message-id: <000001be0d53$a4b785d0$aca7e584@rulfyn.MEDFAC.LEIDENUNIV.NL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 In the Fortran 95 Draft DIS 1539-1, section 5.1.2.10 and 5.1.2.11 the EXTERNAL and INTRINSIC attributes specify external, dummy and intrinsic functions. Is this correct? Shouldn't this be external and intrinsic procedures? How can you specify subroutines with the same name as intrinsic subroutines to be non-intrinsic to avoid name clashes otherwise? Erik W. Kruyt Leiden University Dept. of Physiology P.O. box 9604 2300 RC Leiden Netherlands