From maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov Tue Nov 3 17:30:20 1998 Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA24327 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 17:30:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 08:32:32 -0800 Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.48.90]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 103-49741U1500L100S0) with ESMTP id AAA9846 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 08:29:41 -0800 Received: (from maine@localhost) by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA14141; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 08:29:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 08:29:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199811031629.IAA14141@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov> From: Richard Maine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "WG5 members (list)" Subject: (SC22WG5.1544) (SC22WG5.1543) Date of next year's WG5 meeting In-Reply-To: <199811031555.QAA24266@dkuug.dk> References: <199811030952.KAA23507@dkuug.dk> <199811031555.QAA24266@dkuug.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Dick Hendrickson writes: > If you do correct them, then the J3 dates should also be changed > (making the likely guess that the 2 meetings will be back to back). Whereas it seems like a good guess, wouldn't it be good to actually co-ordinate with the host before just declaring that the date has changed? Seems like otherwise you are just asking for yet another date change in the future, compounding the confusion. I seem to recall asking pretty much the same kind of question at the last J3 meeting when we went through the exercise of figuring out when the J3 Oxford meeting would be. (Evidently an exercise based on an incorrect premise of the WG5 meeting date). -- Richard Maine maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov