From Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com Tue Dec 23 16:18:56 1997 Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA07198 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 16:18:52 +0100 Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id JAA12475; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 09:19:37 -0600 Received: from dial107-84.mixcom.com(207.227.107.84) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma012465; Tue Dec 23 09:19:35 1997 Message-ID: <349FD645.4699@mixcom.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 09:18:29 -0600 From: "Craig T. Dedo" Reply-To: Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com Organization: Elmbrook Computer Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Malcolm Cohen CC: WG5 Mailing List Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1480) Edit missing from N1282 (allocatable TR) References: <199712231158.MAA04465@dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Malcolm Cohen wrote: > > I think the DTR has gone forward to JTC1, so I don't think we can do much > with it right now. Very unfortunate timing. > Miles, what is the position on this? I presume we cannot change a DTR > after the JTC1 ballot - or are the rules a bit looser for TRs? > We cannot do anything "AT ONCE", and I am certainly opposed to pulling > the TR back at this stage (to go through another N re-ballots, with > yet another 12-18 month delay) just because of this. It does not look > like a show-stopper to me (if others disagree I guess the JTC1 vote will > not be to accept!). > If we can correct it between JTC1 approval and publication well and > good; if not, it can be handled by the usual erratum procedures. I did not intend to state or imply that I wanted the JTC1 approval process stopped or delayed. Obviously, that would not be at all helpful. I like Malcolm's suggestion on how to correct the defect. -- ---------- Sincerely, Craig T. Dedo Internet: Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com Elmbrook Computer Services Voice Phone: (414) 783-5869 17130 W. Burleigh Place Brookfield, WI 53005 Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. USA They do NOT represent any organization. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1759)