From cdedo@checkfree.com Thu Jul 24 20:38:55 1997 Received: from sol.checkfree.com (sol.checkfree.com [198.246.154.250]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA27014 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 20:38:53 +0200 Received: from mail.checkfree.com by sol.checkfree.com via smtpd (for dkuug.dk [193.88.44.89]) with SMTP; 24 Jul 1997 18:38:51 UT Received: from colrelay.checkfree.com (colrelay.checkfree.com [10.10.0.22]) by mail.checkfree.com with SMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id OAA04595 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by colrelay.checkfree.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) id 852564DE.0065FFA8 ; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:34:05 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: CHECKFREE From: "Craig Dedo" To: WG5 Mailing List Message-ID: <852564DE.0006259D.00@colrelay.checkfree.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 21:15:39 -0400 Subject: WG5 Vienna Meeting - Any Developments? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I have heard nothing about any developments at this week's WG5 meeting. I have some questions for anyone who would care to answer, either officially or unofficially: 1. Have there been any developments at the WG5 meeting? 2. Specifically, are any of the recently approved Fortran 2000 features in danger of being killed off? 3. Anything not on the list that is likely to be added? 4. Any new / revised mandates from SC22? 5. What are the significant developments, if any, on each of the features approved for Fortran 2000? For the record, I will be working at home on Friday, July 25. I hope to complete work on my papers on Edits for Named Scratch Files and the revised technical specification for Command Line Arguments. The command Line Arguments paper is 95% done. If time permits (ha, ha), I hope to draft some very preliminary work on VOLATILE attribute and statement and Stream I/O. I also have some thoughts on other issues. Please let me know what is going on.