From J.Reid@letterbox.rl.ac.uk  Tue Apr 22 17:08:22 1997
Received: from letterbox.rl.ac.uk (letterbox.rl.ac.uk [130.246.8.100]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA18613 for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 17:08:13 +0200
Received: from jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk by letterbox.rl.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) 
          id <sg.18948-0@letterbox.rl.ac.uk>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 16:07:21 +0100
Received: by jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18970;
          Tue, 22 Apr 97 16:07:19 BST
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 97 16:07:19 BST
From: jkr@letterbox.rl.ac.uk (John Reid)
Message-Id: <9704221507.AA18970@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk>
To: Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1364) Enhanced data Types DTR - WG5 Ballot to forward
Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk


 
----------------------- Individual WG5 Ballot -----------------------------
Please return this ballot to the Convenor NO LATER THAN 18TH MAY 1997.

                                                            __________
I agree that N1275 should be forwarded for its final       |     |    |
DTR ballot in its present form                             |     | NO |
                                                           |_____|____|

If NO, give changes required before it is balloted:

1. In the edit for page 203, change 'Delete' to 'Replace'.

2. To go with the edit for page 203, we also need the edit 

    205:5. Add 'If the allocation status of the entity or an ultimate 
    component thereof is affected through the dummy argument, then at
    any time during the execution of the procedure, either before or
    after the allocation or deallocation, it may be referenced only
    through the dummy argument.'

It might be argued that this is not necessary since altering the
allocation status affects the value, but just as it is clearer to
distinguish the two on page 203, so it is on page 205.



(signed) John Reid.     (date) 22 April 1997

----------------------------- End of WG5 Ballot ----------------------------


 
