From Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com  Sun Mar 16 04:59:38 1997
Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA10737 for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 04:59:29 +0100
Received: from 205.254.192.149 by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2)
	   id VAA27685; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 21:56:08 -0600
Message-Id: <199703160356.VAA27685@mixcom.mixcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 97 22:00:20 -0600
From: Craig Dedo <Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1346) Exceptions PDTR: New form of USE stmt
To: hennecke@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Michael Hennecke)
Cc: WG5 Mailing List <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
In-Reply-To: <199703151426.PAA26394@dkuug.dk>
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17

Dear Michael & the WG5 mailing List:

On Sat, 15 Mar 1997, hennecke@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Michael Hennecke) wrote:
>It's a bit late for this one, but when copying John's edits for intrinsic
>modules to the Interop PDTR, I stumbled over the new form of the USE stmt.
>In N1231 it is
>
>  R1107 <use-stmt> <<is>> USE [ ,<module-nature> :: ] <module-name> ...
>
>Because in F95 it was tried to regularize the :: usage on all statements,
>I'd rather like this changed rule to read 
>
>  R1107 <use-stmt> <<is>> USE [ [,<module-nature>] :: ] <module-name> ...
>
>Otherwise, we'd introduce a new irregularity for :: just when we removed
>all the old ones (e.g. EXTERNAL [::]). 
>
>Opinions?
>Michael

    I agree.

----------
Sincerely,
Craig T. Dedo             	Internet:    Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com
Elmbrook Computer Services	Voice Phone: (414) 783-5869
17130 W. Burleigh Place		
Brookfield, WI   53005		Disclaimer:  These opinions are mine alone.
USA				They do NOT represent any organization.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -- Benjamin Franklin (1759)
