From david@imagine1.com  Tue Feb  4 17:33:02 1997
Received: from kitsune.swcp.com (kitsune.swcp.com [198.59.115.2]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA18771 for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:32:55 +0100
Received: from ppp128.swcp.com (ppp128.swcp.com [204.134.0.178]) by kitsune.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA28236; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:32:33 -0700
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:32:33 -0700
Message-Id: <199702041632.JAA28236@kitsune.swcp.com>
X-Sender: evt@swcp.com (Unverified)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Miles Ellis <Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk>
From: david@imagine1.com (David Epstein)
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1251) Informal Review of Conditional Compilation Draft Standard
Cc: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4>

Miles,
                                                  _____
>I believe that the current draft is ready for   | YES |
>submission to SC22 for its first CD ballot      |_____|


This vote is a YES with the comment that I agree with most of the
editorial suggestions that are being made.

This document, like Part 1 or a diamond, is perfect depending on how
closely you look at it.  Obviously, the closer one looks, the more
likely an imperfection presents itself.

David Epstein
Imagine1, Inc.
1997, Feb. 4th