From rz48@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de  Mon Feb  3 19:59:01 1997
Received: from nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.7]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA01270 for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:58:51 +0100
Message-Id: <199702031858.TAA01270@dkuug.dk>
Received: from ry73.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de by nz11.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with SMTP (PP); Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:58:44 +0100
Received: by ry73.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA25334; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:58:41 +0100
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1270) Informal Review of Source Processing Draft Standard
To: lrr@cray.com (Larry Rolison)
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:58:41 +0100 (CET)
Cc: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
In-Reply-To: <199701272024.VAA22705@dkuug.dk> from "Larry Rolison" at Jan 27, 97 02:23:31 pm
From: hennecke@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Michael Hennecke)
Reply-To: hennecke@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Michael Hennecke)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2170      

According to Larry Rolison:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Informal Ballot on N1247 (Draft Standard for Source Processing in Fortran)
>                                                         ____________
> I believe that the current draft should supplant        | YES | NO |
> the current "Fortran-like" model in all further         |     |    |
> considerations of source processing ("conditional       ------------
> compilation")

Given that question, there can be no answer. N1247 is a WG5 working document, 
but not a "Draft Standard for Source Processing in Fortran" because WG5
delegated that work to a development body, which delivered such a document
as N1243.

You may supplement your NO vote on the draft PDTR N1243 by your document 
N1247 (which may help in the technical debate), but cannot claim that status 
for your own document. What would happen if I'd issue a new Fortran 95 DIS 
to "supplant" the *true* DIS issued by that projects's editor?

> If NO, please provide details of what changes you wish to see made in order
> that the document will be suitable for substitution for the "Fortran-like"
> model.  NOTE:  I am NOT interested in NO votes based on either of
[snip]

I would like to see this issue addressed (if not solved) within the 
development body, rather than by "supplanting" the development done
by that body with an imitation of an "official informal" ballot on
a personal submission.

> (signed) Michael Hennecke........................
> (date)   1997/02/03..............................

Cheers,
Michael

 ======================================================================
  Michael Hennecke      http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~Michael.Hennecke/ 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  University of Karlsruhe         RFC822: hennecke@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de 
  Computing Center (G20.21 R210)               No longer on BITNET :-(
  Zirkel 2  *  P.O. Box 69 80                 Phone: +49 721  608-4862 
  D-76128  Karlsruhe                               Fax: +49 721  32550 
 ======================================================================