From J.Reid@letterbox.rl.ac.uk  Fri Aug  9 17:04:28 1996
Received: from letterbox.rl.ac.uk (letterbox.rl.ac.uk [130.246.8.100]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA08002 for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:03:24 +0200
Received: from jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk by letterbox.rl.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) 
          id <sg.29834-0@letterbox.rl.ac.uk>; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 16:02:03 +0100
Received: by jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA24146;
          Fri, 9 Aug 96 16:02:01 BST
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 96 16:02:01 BST
From: jkr@letterbox.rl.ac.uk (John Reid)
Message-Id: <9608091502.AA24146@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk>
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk, LPMeissner@msn.com
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1141) Preliminary minutes of Dresden WG5 meeting

For FLOATING-POINT EXCEPTION HANDLING, I think you meant the 
second vote to be:

 
  (N1195r1 page 15): In case of integer overflow during conversion  
  to an integer, the processor must signal "IEEE INVALID"
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  12 yes
   6 no


Is this right?


Best wishes,

John. 
