From Keith.Bierman@Eng.Sun.COM  Wed Jun  5 02:08:03 1996
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA29325 for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 5 Jun 1996 02:08:02 +0200
Received: by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM)
	id RAA05867; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 17:07:06 -0700
Received: from chiba.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.3)
	id AA21314; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 17:07:00 -0700
Received: from chiba (localhost) by chiba.eng.sun.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA15655; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 17:06:59 -0700
Message-Id: <9606050006.AA15655@chiba.eng.sun.com>
To: Keith Bierman QED <Keith.Bierman@Eng.Sun.COM>
Cc: pichon@obspm.fr, sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1099) ROUND function in the French proposal about Fortran 2000 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:25:19 PDT."
             <199606042327.BAA29162@dkuug.dk> 
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 17:06:58 -0700
From: Keith Bierman QED <Keith.Bierman@Eng.Sun.COM>


Of course, I had a typo. It's the 
	2.0+3.0 which can be computed in a standard conformant fashion
	as 4.0

that is the problem, not computing it as 5.0!