From Keith.Bierman@Eng.Sun.COM  Thu May 23 00:34:27 1996
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA26188 for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 23 May 1996 00:34:25 +0200
Received: by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM)
	id PAA00904; Wed, 22 May 1996 15:33:08 -0700
Received: from chiba.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.3)
	id AA16607; Wed, 22 May 1996 15:33:04 -0700
Received: from chiba (localhost) by chiba.eng.sun.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA25592; Wed, 22 May 1996 15:33:01 -0700
Message-Id: <9605222233.AA25592@chiba.eng.sun.com>
To: ljm@slac.stanford.edu (Leonard J. Moss)
Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk (SC22/WG5 Mailing List)
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1090) X3J3 work in progress on asynch I/O 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 May 1996 15:07:13 -0800."
             <199605222208.AAA24417@dkuug.dk> 
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 15:33:01 -0700
From: Keith Bierman QED <Keith.Bierman@Eng.Sun.COM>


It was mentioned. I don't think it was *seriously* considered. It gets
*very* complex on the implementation side.

But if you promise to come back to work on it, we can see about
handling it your way ;>