From maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov Fri Mar 15 16:32:33 1996 Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.34.72]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA06461 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:32:28 +0100 Received: by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id HAA04296; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 07:33:04 -0800 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 07:33:04 -0800 Message-Id: <199603151533.HAA04296@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov> From: Richard Maine To: m-tanaka@lp.nm.fujitsu.co.jp CC: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk In-reply-to: <199603151136.MAA00434@dkuug.dk> (message from Minoru Tanaka on Fri, 15 Mar 1996 20:34:10 +0900) Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1048) Does anyone have complete diff between F90 and F95 ? > We, Japanese Fortran Standard Committee, will begin to translate Fortran 95 > to Japanese in April. We are looking for complete diff file between F90 and > F95 in order to translate efficiently. > Does anyone have such the diff file ? I doubt it. Anyway, I don't. In fact, I don't have f90 and f95 in compatable formats. F90 was done in some form of troff; I don't recall the details (Walt Brainerd knows). There was considerable work in converting the f90 document source into a form useable by Frame, which is used for f95. The first step of this was an automatic converter, but a lot of manual fix-up was required after the translator was run. Fixing up problems in the format translation was done concurrently with incorporation of edits from corrigendum 1. Thus, there was never a Frame version of the original f90 text. Probably the closest to a practical way of making a diff would be to get ascii copies of both f90 and f95 and to write a suitable diff program to work with them (the standard unix diff wouldn't do). -- Richard Maine maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov