From JKR@ib.rl.ac.uk Tue Apr 7 05:19:42 1992 Received: from danpost2.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA13238; Tue, 7 Apr 92 05:19:42 +0200 Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by danpost2.uni-c.dk (5.65/1.34) id AA28970; Tue, 7 Apr 92 03:18:29 GMT Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by vm.uni-c.dk (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP id 9418; Tue, 07 Apr 92 05:20:19 DNT Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by vm.uni-c.dk (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6338; Tue, 07 Apr 92 05:20:19 DNT Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0524; Mon, 06 Apr 92 17:53:01 BST Received: from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 5166; Mon, 06 Apr 92 17:53:01 BST Via: UK.AC.RL.IB; 6 APR 92 17:52:57 BST Message-Id: <06 Apr 92 17:36:36 BST JKR@UK.AC.RL.IB> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 17:36:36 BST From: "JKR" (JKR at UKACRL) To: meissner%lynx.cs.usfca.edu@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: S20 in Fortran Forum X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 I have only just seen your note, having been away all last week in France and Germany (giving two talks on F90). I think that S20 is not yet ready for publication in Fortran Forum. It is a first draft for X3J3 to work on at the next meeting. I have not checked it all, but I think that items 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29, and 32 are incorrect or incomplete. I believe also that there are some items that have been approved but are not included. I would like to persuade you to wait until after the WG5 meeting and then publish those interpretations that have passed X3J3's procedures and been approved by WG5. If you publish anything now, please make it clear that it is a working draft that has not yet been approved by either X3J3 or WG5. John Reid.