Document #: | P3557R0 |
Date: | 2025-01-12 |
Project: | Programming Language C++ |
Audience: |
LEWG Library Evolution |
Reply-to: |
Eric Niebler <eric.niebler@gmail.com> |
“Only the exceptional paths bring exceptional glories!”
— Mehmet Murat Ildan
The hardest part of writing a sender algorithm is often the computation of its completion signatures, an intricate meta-programming task. Using sender algorithms incorrectly leads to large, incomprehensible errors deep within the completion-signatures meta-program. What is needed is a way to propagate type errors automatically to the API boundary where they can be reported concisely, much the way exceptions do for runtime errors.
Support for exceptions during constant-evaluation was recently accepted into the Working Draft for C++26. We can take advantage of this powerful new feature to easily propagate type errors during the computation of a sender’s completion signatures. This significantly improves the diagnostics users are likely to encounter while also simplifying the job of writing new sender algorithms.
This paper proposes the following changes to the working draft with the addition of [P3164R3]. Subsequent sections will address the motivation and the designs in detail.
std::execution::get_completion_signatures
from a customization point object that accepts a sender and (optionally)
an environment to a consteval
function template that takes no arguments, as follows:
Before
|
After
|
---|---|
|
|
get_completion_signatures
from a
member function that accepts the cv-qualified sender object and
an optional environment object to a
static constexpr
function
template that take the sender and environment types as template
parameters.
Before
|
After
|
---|---|
|
|
sender_in<Sender, Env...>
concept to test that get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
is a constant expression.
Before
|
After
|
---|---|
|
|
In the exposition-only
basic-sender
class
template, specify under what conditions its
get_completion_signatures
static
member function is ill-formed when called without an
Env
template parameter (see
proposed wording for details).
Add a dependent_sender
concept that is modeled by sender types that do not know how they will
complete independent of their execution environment.
[Optional]: Remove the
transform_completion_signatures
alias template.
The following additions are suggested by this paper to make working
with completion signatures in
constexpr
code easier. None of
these additions is strictly necessary.
Extend the completion_signatures
class template with constexpr
operations that make the manipulation of completion signatures more
ergonomic. These extensions are:
Combining two sets of completion signatures with
operator+
.
Treating an instance of a completion signatures specialization as
a tuple of function pointers. For example, completion_signatures<set_value_t(int), set_stopped_t()>{}
would be usable as if it were tuple<set_value_t(*)(), set_stopped_t(*)()>{nullptr, nullptr}
,
which makes std::apply
useful
for munging completion signatures.
Adding CTAD to
completion_signatures
to deduce
the signature types from a list of function pointers. Together with the
above item, the following is the identity transform, given a
completion_signatures
object
cs
:
auto cs2 = std::apply([](auto... sigs){ return completion_signatures{sigs...}; }, cs); static_assert(^^decltype(cs) == ^^decltype(cs2));
Add a make_completion_signatures
helper function that takes signatures as template arguments or as
function arguments or both. The returned value would have signatures
that have been normalized, sorted ([P2830R7]), and made unique.
Add a get_child_completion_signatures
function template that makes it easy for a sender adaptor to get the
completion signatures of the child sender with the proper cv
qualification. It is simply:
template <class Parent, class Child, class... Env> consteval auto get_child_completion_signatures() { using CvChild = decltype(std::forward_like<Parent>(declval<Child&>())); return get_completion_signatures<CvChild, Env...>(); }
Reintroduce transform_completion_signatures
as a constexpr
function template
that accepts lambdas as transforms. For example, the following code
removes all error completions from a set,
cs
:
auto cs2 = transform_completion_signatures( cs,{}, // accept the default value completion transform []<class Error>() { return completion_signatures{}; });
See transform_completion_signatures
for a design description and reference implementation of the
transform_completion_signatures
function template.
Add an invalid_completion_signature
consteval
function template
whose return type is
completion_signatures<>
but that throws an unspecified exception type that contains diagnostic
information. A typical use would look like this:
template <class Q> template <class Self, class Env> static constexpr auto read_env_sender<Q>::get_completion_signatures() { namespace exec = std::execution; if constexpr (!std::invocable<Q, Env>) { // return type deduced to be completion_signatures<> but function exits // with an exception that contains the relevant diagnostic information. return exec::invalid_completion_signature< <read_env>, _IN_ALGORITHM(Q), _WITH_QUERY(Env) _WITH_ENVIRONMENT>("The environment does not provide a value for the given query type."); } else { using Result = std::invoke_result_t<Q, Env>; return exec::completion_signatures<exec::set_value_t(Result)>(); } }
This paper exists principly to improve the experience of users who make type errors in their sender expressions by leveraging exceptions during constant- evaluation. It is a follow-on of [P3164R2], which defines a category of “non-dependent” senders that can and must be type-checked early.
Senders have a construction phase and a subsequent connection phase. Prior to P3164, all type-checking of senders happened at the connection phase (when a sender is connected to a receiver). P3164 mandates that the sender algorithms type-check non-dependent senders, moving the diagnostic closer to the source of the error.
This paper addresses the quality of those diagnostics and the diagnostics users encounter when a dependent sender fails type-checking at connection time.
Senders are expression trees, and type errors can happen deep within their structure. If programmed naively, ill-formed senders would generate megabytes of incomprehensible diagnostics. The challenge is to report type errors concisely and comprehensibly, at the right level of abstraction.
Doing this requires propagating domain-specific descriptions of type errors out of the completion signatures meta-program so they can be reported concisely. Such error detection and propagation is very cumbersome in template meta-programming.
The C++ solution to error propagation is exceptions. With the
adoption of [P3068R6], C++26 has
gained the ability to throw and catch exceptions during
constant-evaluation. If we express the computation of completion
signatures as a constexpr
meta-program, we can use exceptions to propagate type errors. This
greatly improves diagnostics and even simplifies the code that computes
completion signatures.
This paper proposes changes to
std::execution
that make the
computation of a sender’s completion signatures an evaluation of a
constexpr
function. It also
specifies the conditions under which the computation is to exit with an
exception.
get_completion_signatures
In the Working Draft, a sender’s completion signatures are determined
by the type of the expression std::execution::get_completion_signatures(sndr, env)
(or, after P3164, std::execution::get_completion_signatures(sndr)
for non-dependent senders). Only the type of the expression matters; the
expression itself is never evaluated.
In the design proposed by this paper, the
get_completion_signatures
expression must be constant-evaluated in order use exceptions to report
errors. To make it ammenable to constant evaluation, it must not accept
arguments with runtime values, so the expression is changed to std::execution::get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
,
where get_completion_signatures
is a consteval
function.
If an unhandled exception propagates out of
get_completion_signatures
the
program is ill-formed (because
get_completion_signatures
is
consteval
). The diagnostic
displays the type and value of the exception.
std::execution::get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
in turn calls remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template
get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
, which computes
the completion signatures or throws as appropriate, as shown below:
namespace exec = std::execution; struct void_sender { using sender_concept = exec::sender_t; template <class Self, class... Env> static constexpr auto get_completion_signatures() { return exec::completion_signatures<exec::set_value_t()>(); } /* … more … */ };
To better support the
constexpr
value-oriented
programming style, calls to
get_completion_signatures
from a
constexpr
function are never
ill-formed, and they always have a
completion_signatures
type.
get_completion_signatures
reports errors by failing to be a constant expression.
[P3164R3] introduces the concept of
non-dependent senders: senders that have the same completion signatures
regardless of the receiver’s execution environment. For a sender type
DependentSndr
whose completions
do depend on the environment, what should happen when the
sender’s completions are queried without an environment? That is, what
should the semantics be for get_completion_signatures<DependentSndr>()
?
get_completion_signatures<DependentSndr>()
should follow the general rule: it should be well-formed in a
constexpr
function, and it
should have a
completion_signatures
type. That
way, sender adaptors do not need to do anything special when computing
the completions of child senders that are dependent. So get_completion_signatures<DependentSndr>()
should throw.
If get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
throws for dependent senders, and it also throws for non-dependent
senders that fail to type-check, how then do we distinguish between
valid dependent and invalid non-dependent senders? We can distinguish by
checking the type of the exception.
An example will help. Consider the
read_env(q)
sender, a dependent
sender that sends the result of calling
q
with the receiver’s
environment. It cannot compute its completion signatures without an
environment. The natural way for the
read_env
sender to express that
is to require an Env
parameter
to its customization of
get_completion_signatures
:
namespace exec = std::execution; template <class Query> struct read_env_sender { using sender_concept = exec::sender_t; template <class Self, class Env> // NOTE: Env is not optional! static constexpr auto get_completion_signatures() { if constexpr (!std::invocable<Query, Env>) { throw
exception-type-goes-here
(); } else { using Result = std::invoke_result_t<Query, Env>; return exec::completion_signatures<exec::set_value_t(Result)>(); } } /* … more … */ };
That makes read_env_sender<Q>::get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
an ill-formed expression, which the
get_completion_signatures
function can detect. In such cases, it would throw an exception of a
special type that it can catch later when distinguishing between
dependent and non-dependent senders.
Since the design has several parts, reading the implementation of
get_completion_signatures
is
probably the easiest way to understand it. The implementation is shown
below with comments describing the parts.
// Some exposition-only helpers: template <template <class...> class C, class... Ts> using
well-formed-type
= // exposition only requires { typename C<Ts...>; }; template <class Sndr, class... Env> usingcompletion-signatures-of
= // exposition only decltype(remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()); // A sender is dependent when its get_completion_signatures customization // cannot be called without an environment parameter. template <class Sndr, class... Env> conceptdependent-sender-without-env
= // exposition only (sizeof...(Env) == 0) && !well-formed-type
<completion-signatures-of
, Sndr>; template <completion_signatures> concepthas-constexpr-completions-helper
= true; // exposition only // A concept that tests that a sender's customization of get_completion_signatures // is well-formed, a constant expression, and has a type that is a specialization // of completion_signatures<>. template <class Sndr, class... Env> concepthas-constexpr-completions
= // exposition onlyhas-constexpr-completions-helper
< <Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()>; remove_reference_t // This is a special exception type that will be thrown by // std::execution::get_completion_signatures when trying to query a dependent // sender for its non-dependent completions. structdependent-sender-error
{ }; // exposition only // Given a sender and zero or one environment, compute the sender's completion // signatures. Calls to this function are always well-formed and have a type // that is a specialization of completion_signatures. template <class Sndr, class... Env> constexpr autoget-completion-signatures-impl
() { usingsndr-type
= remove_reference_t<Sndr>; if constexpr (has-constexpr-completions
<Sndr, Env...>) { // In the happy case where Sndr's customization is well-formed, a constant // expression, and has a completion_signatures<> type, just return the // result of calling the customization. returnsndr-type
::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>(); } else if constexpr (dependent-sender-without-env
<Sndr, Env...>) { // If Sndr is dependent and we don't have an environment, throw an exception, // but ensure that the return type of this function is a specialization // of completion_signatures. return (throwdependent-sender-error
(), completion_signatures()); } else if constexpr (!well-formed-type
<completion-signatures-of
, Sndr, Env...>>) { // For some reason, the Sndr's customization cannot be called even with an // environment. This is a library bug; it should always be callable from // a constexpr context. Report the library bug by throwing an exception, // taking care to ensure the return type is a completion_signatures type. return (throwunspecified
, completion_signatures()); } else { // Otherwise, we reach here under the following conditions: // - The call to Sndr's customization cannot be constant-evaluated (possibly // because it throws), or // - Its return type is not a completion_signatures type. // // We want to call the call the Sndr's customization so that if it throws // an exception, that exception's information will appear in the diagnostic. // If it doesn't throw, _we_ should throw to let the developer know that // their customization returned an invalid type. And again, ensure that // the return type is a completion_signatures type. return (sndr-type
::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>(), throwunspecified
, ()); completion_signatures} } // Applies a late sender transformation if appropriate, then computes the // completion signatures. Calls to this function are always well-formed and // have a type that is a specialization of completion_signatures. template <class Sndr, class... Env> consteval auto get_completion_signatures() { if constexpr (sizeof...(Env) == 0) { returnget-completion-signatures-impl
<Sndr>(); } else { // Apply a late sender transform: using NewSndr = decltype(transform_sender(/* … */)); returnget-completion-signatures-impl
<NewSndr, Env...>(); } }
Given this definition of
get_completion_signatures
, we
can implement a dependent_sender
concept as follows:
// Returns true when get_completion_signatures<Sndr>() throws a // dependent-sender-error. Returns false when // get_completion_signatures<Sndr>() returns normally (Sndr is non-dependent), // or when it throws any other kind of exception (Sndr fails type-checking). template <class Sndr> consteval bool
is-dependent-sender-helper
() { try { <Sndr>(); get_completion_signatures} catch (dependent-sender-error
&) { return true; } return false; } template <class Sndr> concept dependent_sender = <Sndr> && std::bool_constant<is-dependent-sender-helper
<Sndr>()>::value; sender
After the adoption of [P3164R3], the sender algorithms are all required to return senders that are either dependent or else that type-check successfully. One way to implement this is with the following helper:
template <class Sndr> constexpr auto __type_check_sender(Sndr sndr) { if constexpr (!dependent_sender<Sndr>) { // This line will fail to compile if Sndr fails its type checking. We // don't want to perform this type checking when Sndr is dependent, though. // Without an environment, the sender doesn't know its completions. <Sndr>(); get_completion_signatures} return sndr; }
Sender algorithms could use this helper when returning the new
sender. For example, the then
algorithm might look something like this:
inline constexpr struct then_t : __pipeable_sender_adaptor<then_t> { template <sender Sndr, class Fn> auto operator()(Sndr sndr, Fn fn) const { return __type_check_sender(__then_sender{std::move(sndr), std::move(fn)}); } } then {};
sender_in
With the above changes, we need to tweak the
sender_in
concept to require
that get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
is a constant expression.
The changes to sender_in
relative to [P3164R3] are as
follows:
template <auto>
concept is-constant = true; // exposition only
template<class Sndr, class... Env> concept sender_in = <Sndr> && sender(sizeof...(Env) <= 1) (queryable<Env> &&...) &&is-constant<get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()>;
requires (Sndr&& sndr, Env&&... env) {
{ get_completion_signatures(std::forward<Sndr>(sndr), std::forward<Env>(env)...) }
-> valid-completion-signatures;
};
basic-sender
The sender algorithms are expressed in terms of the exposition-only
class template
basic-sender
. The
mechanics of computing completion signatures is not specified, however,
so very little change there is needed to implement this proposal.
We do, however, have to say when
basic-sender::get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
is ill-formed. In [P3164R3],
non-dependent senders are dealt with by discussing whether or not a
sender’s potentially-evaluated completion operations are dependent on
the type of the receiver’s environment. In this paper, we make a similar
appeal when specifying whether or not
basic-sender::get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
is well-formed.
dependent_sender
Users who write their own sender adaptors will also want to perform early type-checking of senders that are not dependent. Therefore, they need a way to determine whether or not a sender is dependent.
In the section get_completion_signatures
we show how the concept
dependent_sender
can be
implemented in terms of this paper’s
get_completion_signatures
function template. By making this a public-facing concept, we give
sender adaptor authors a way to do early type-checking, just like the
standard adaptors.
completion_signatures
Computing completions signatures is now to be done using
constexpr
meta-programming by
manipulating values using ordinary imperative C++ rather than template
meta-programming. To better support this style of programming, it is
helpful to add constexpr
operations that manipulate instances of specializations of the
completion_signatures
class
template.
For example, it should be possible to take the union of two sets of
completion signatures. operator+
seems like a natural choice for that:
<set_value_t(int), set_error_t(exception_ptr)> cs1; completion_signatures<set_stopped_t(), set_error_t(exception_ptr)> cs2; completion_signatures auto cs3 = cs1 + cs2; // completion_signatures<set_value_t(int), // set_error_t(exception_ptr), // set_stopped_t()>
It can also be convenient for
completion_signature
specializations to model tuple-like
.
Although tuple elements cannot have funtion type, they can have function
pointer type. With this proposal, an object like completion_signatures<set_value_t(int), set_stopped_t()>{}
behaves like tuple<set_value_t(*)(int), set_stopped_t(*)()>{nullptr, nullptr}
(except that it wouldn’t actually have to store the
nullptr
s). That would make it
possible to manipulate completion signatures using
std::apply
:
auto cs = /* … */; // Add an lvalue reference to all arguments of all signatures: auto add_ref = []<class T, class... As>(T(*)(As...)) -> T(*)(As&...) { return {}; }; auto add_ref_all = [=](auto... sigs) { return make_completion_signatures(add_ref(sigs)...); }; return std::apply(add_ref_all, cs);
The code above uses another nice-to-have feature: a
make_completion_signatures
helper function that deduces the signatures from the arguments, removes
any duplicates, and returns a new instance of
completion_signatures
.
Consider trying to do all the above using template meta-programming. 😬
make_completion_signatures
The
make_completion_signatures
helper function described just above would allow users to build a
completion_signatures
object
from a bunch of signature types, or from function pointer objects, or a
combination of both:
// Returns a default-initialized object of type completion_signatures<Sigs...>, // where Sigs is the set union of the normalized ExplicitSigs and DeducedSigs. template <
completion-signature
... ExplicitSigs,completion-signature
... DeducedSigs> constexpr auto make_completion_signatures(DeducedSigs*... sigs) noexcept ->valid-completion-signatures
auto;
To “normalize” a completion signature means to strip rvalue
references from the arguments. So, set_value_t(int&&, float&)
becomes
set_value_t(int, float&)
.
make_completions_signatures
first normalizes all the signatures and then removes duplicates. ([P2830R7] lets us order types, so making
the set unique will be O(n log n).)
transform_completion_signatures
The current Working Draft has a utility to make type transformations
of completion signature sets simpler: the alias template
transform_completion_signatures
.
It looks like this:
template <class... As> using value-transform-default = completion_signatures<set_value_t(As...)>; template <class Error> using error-transform-default = completion_signatures<set_error_t(Error)>; template <valid-completion-signatures Completions, = completion_signatures<>, valid-completion-signatures OtherCompletions template <class...> class ValueTransform = value-transform-default, template <class> class ErrorTransform = error-transform-default, = completion_signatures<set_stopped_t()>> valid-completion-signatures StoppedCompletions using transform_completion_signatures = /*see below*/;
Anything that can be done with
transform_completion_signatures
can be done in constexpr
using
std::apply
, a lambda with
if constexpr
, and
operator+
of
completion_signature
objects. In
fact, we could even implement
transform_completion_signatures
itself that way:
template </* … as before … */> using transform_completion_signatures = ::constant_wrapper< // see [@P2781R5] std::apply( std[](auto... sigs) { return ([]<class T, class... As>(T (*)(As...)) { if constexpr (^^T == ^^set_value_t) { // use reflection to test type equality return ValueTransform<As...>(); } else if constexpr (^^T == ^^set_error_t) { return ErrorTransform<As...[0]>(); } else { return StoppedCompletions(); } }(sigs) +...+ completion_signatures()); }, () Completions) + OtherCompletions() >::value_type;
This paper proposes dropping the
transform_completion_signatures
type alias since it is not in the ideal form for
constexpr
meta-programming, and
since std::apply
is good enough
(sort of).
However, should we decide to keep the functionality of
transform_completion_signatures
,
we can reexpress it as a
constexpr
function that accepts
transforms as lambdas:
constexpr auto value-transform-default = []<class... As>() { return completion_signatures<set_value_t(As...)>(); }; constexpr auto error-transform-default = []<class Error>() { return completion_signatures<set_error_t(Error)>(); }; template <valid-completion-signatures Completions, class ValueTransform = decltype(value-transform-default), class ErrorTransform = decltype(error-transform-default), = completion_signatures<set_stopped_t()>, valid-completion-signatures StoppedCompletions = completion_signatures<>> valid-completion-signatures OtherCompletions consteval auto transform_completion_signatures(Completions completions, = {}, ValueTransform value_transform = {}, ErrorTransform error_transform = {}, StoppedCompletions stopped_completions = {}) OtherCompletions other_completions -> valid-completion-signatures auto;
The above form of
transform_completion_signatures
is more natural to use from within a
constexpr
function. It also
makes it simple to accept the default for some arguments as shown
below:
// Transform just the error completion signatures: auto cs2 = transform_completion_signatures(cs, {}, []<class E>() { return /* … */; }); // ^^ Accept the default value transform
Since accepting the default transforms is simple, we are able to move
the infrequently used
OtherCompletions
argument to the
end of the argument list.
Although the signature of this
transform_completion_signatures
function looks frightful, the implementation is quite straightforward,
and seeing it might make it less scary:
template <class... As, class Fn> consteval auto __apply_transform(const Fn& fn) { if constexpr (!requires {{fn.template operator()<As...>()} -> __valid_completion_signatures;}) return invalid_completion_signature< … >( … ); // see below else return fn.template operator()<As...>(); } template < /* … as shown above … */ > consteval auto transform_completion_signatures(Completions completions, ValueTransform value_transform, ErrorTransform error_transform, StoppedCompletions stopped_completions,) { OtherCompletions other_completionsauto transform1 = [=]<class T, class... As>(Tag(*)(As...)) { if constexpr (Tag() == set_value) // see "Completion tag comparison" below return __apply_transform<As...>(value_transform); else if constexpr (Tag() == set_error) return __apply_transform<As...>(error_transform); else return stopped_completions; }; auto transform_all = [=](auto*... sigs) { return (transform1(sigs) +...+ completion_signatures()); }; return std::apply(transform_all, completions) + other_completions; }
Like
get_completion_signatures
,
transform_completion_signatures
always returns a specialization of
completion_signatures
and
reports errors by throwing exceptions. It expects the lambdas passed to
it to do likewise (but handles it gracefully if they don’t).
invalid_completion_signature
The reason for the design change is to permit the reporting of type
errors using exceptions. Let’s look at an example where it would be
desirable to throw an exception from
get_completion_signatures
: the
then
algorithm. We will use this
example to motivate the rest of the design changes.
The then
algorithm attaches a
continuation to an async operation that executes when the operation
completes successfully. With this proposal, a
then_sender
’s
get_completion_signatures
customization might be implemented as follows:
template <class Sndr, class Fun> template <class Self, class... Env> constexpr auto then_sender<Sndr, Fun>::get_completion_signatures() { // compute the completions of the (properly cv-qualified) child: using Child = decltype(std::forward_like<Self>(declval<Sndr&>())); auto child_completions = get_completion_signatures<Child, Env...>(); // This lambda is used to transform value completion signatures: auto value_transform = []<class... As>() { if constexpr (std::invocable<Fun, As...>) { using Result = std::invoke_result_t<Fun, As...>; return completion_signatures<set_value_t(Result)>(); } else { // Oh no, the user made an error! Tell them about it. throw
some-exception-object
; } }; // Transform just the value completions: return transform_completion_signatures(child_completions, value_transform); }
We would like to make it dead simple to throw an exception that will convey a domain-specific diagnostic to the user. That way, the authors of sender algorithms will be more likely to do so.
The
invalid_completion_signature
helper function is designed to make generating meaningful diagnostics
easy. As an example, here is how the
then_sender
’s
completion_signatures
customization might use it:
template <const auto&> struct IN_ALGORITHM; template <class Sndr, class Fun> template <class Self, class... Env> constexpr auto then_sender<Sndr, Fun>::get_completion_signatures() { /* … */ // This lambda is used to transform value completion signatures: auto value_transform = []<class... As>() { if constexpr (std::invocable<Fun, As...>) { using Result = std::invoke_result_t<Fun, As...>; return completion_signatures<set_value_t(Result)>(); } else { // Oh no, the user made an error! Tell them about it. return invalid_completion_signature< <std::execution::then>, IN_ALGORITHMstruct WITH_FUNCTION(Fun), struct WITH_ARGUMENTS(As...) >("The function passed to std::execution::then is not callable " "with the values sent by the predecessor sender."); } }; /* … */ }
When the user of then
makes a
mistake, say like with the expression
“just(42) | then([]() {…})
”,
they will get a helpful diagnostic like the following (relevant bits
highlighted):
<source>:658:3: error: call to immediate function 'operator|<just_sender<int>>' is not a constant expression 658 | just(42) | then([](){}) | ^ <source>:564:14: note: 'operator|<just_sender<int>>' is an immediate function be cause its body contains a call to an immediate function '__type_check_sender<the n_sender<just_sender<int>, (lambda at <source>:658:19)>>' and that call is not a constant expression 564 | return __type_check_sender(then_sender{{}, self.fn_, sndr}); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <source>:358:11: note: unhandled exception of type '__sender_type_check_failure< const char *, IN_ALGORITHM<then>, WITH_FUNCTION ((lambda at <source>:658:19)), W ITH_ARGUMENTS (int)>' with content {&"The function passed to std::execution::the n is not callable with the values sent by the predecessor sender."[0]} thrown fr om here 358 | throw __sender_type_check_failure<Values...[0], What...>(values...); | ^ 1 error generated. Compiler returned: 1
The above is the complete diagnostic, regardless of how deeply nested the type error is. So long, megabytes of template spew!
Lambdas passed to
transform_completion_signatures
should return a
completion_signatures
specialization (although
transform_completion_signatures
recovers gracefully when they do not). The return type of
invalid_completion_signature
is
completion_signature<>
. By
“returning” the result of calling
invalid_completion_signature
,
the deduced return type of the lambda is a
completion_signatures
type, as
it should be.
A possible implementation of the
invalid_completion_signature
function is shown below:
template <class... What, class... Args> struct sender-type-check-failure : std::exception { // exposition only constexpr sender-type-check-failure(Args... args) : args_{std::move(args)...} {} constexpr char const* what() const noexcept override { return unspecified; }; ::tuple<Args...> args_; // exposition only std}; template <class... What, class... Args> [[noreturn, nodiscard]] consteval completion_signatures<> invalid_completion_signature(Args... args) { throw sender-type-check-failure<What..., Args...>{std::move(args)...}; }
get_child_completion_signatures
In the then_sender
above,
computing a child sender’s completion signatures is a little
awkward:
// compute the completions of the (properly cv-qualified) child: using Child = decltype(std::forward_like<Self>(declval<Sndr&>())); auto child_completions = get_completion_signatures<Child, Env...>();
Computing the completions of child senders will need to be done by
every sender adaptor algorithm. We can make this simpler with a
get_child_completion_signatures
helper function:
// compute the completions of the (properly cv-qualified) child: auto child_completions = get_child_completion_signatures<Self, Sndr, Env...>();
… where
get_child_completion_signatures
is defined as follows:
template <class Parent, class Child, class... Env> consteval auto get_child_completion_signatures() { using cvref-child-type = decltype(std::forward_like<Parent>(declval<Child&>())); return get_completion_signatures<cvref-child-type, Env...>(); }
For convenience, we can make the completion tag types equality-comparable with each other. When writing sender adaptor algorithms, code like the following will be common:
[]<class Tag, class... Args>(Tag(*)(Args...)) { if constexpr (std::is_same_v<Tag, exec::set_value_t>) { // Do something } else { // Do something else } }
Although certainly not hard, with reflection the tag type comparison becomes a litte simpler:
if constexpr (^^Tag == ^^exec::set_value_t>) {
We can make this even easier by simply making the completion tag types equality-comparable, as follows:
if constexpr (Tag() == exec::set_value) {
The author finds that this makes his code read better. Tag types would compare equal to themselves and not-equal to the other two tag types.
eptr_completion_if
The following is a trivial utility that the author finds he uses
surprisingly often. Frequently an async operation can complete
exceptionally, but only under certain conditions. In cases such as
those, it is necessary to add a
set_error_t(std::exception_ptr)
signature to the set of completions, but only when the condition is
met.
This is made simpler with the following variable template:
template <bool PotentiallyThrowing> inline constexpr auto eptr_completion_if = ::conditional_t<PotentiallyThrowing, std<set_error_t(exception_ptr)>, completion_signatures<>>(); completion_signatures
Below is an example usage, from the
then
sender:
template <class Sndr, class Fun> template <class Self, class... Env> constexpr auto then_sender<Sndr, Fun>::get_completion_signatures() { auto cs = get_child_completion_signatures<Self, Sndr, Env...>(); auto value_fn = []<class... As>() { /* … as shown in section "invalid_completion_signature" */ }; constexpr bool nothrow = /* … false if Fun can throw for any set of the predecessor's values */; // Use eptr_completion_if here as the "extra" set of completions that // will be added to the ones returned from the transforms. return transform_completion_signatures(cs, value_fn, {}, {}, eptr_completion_if<!nothrow>); }
Assuming we want to change how completion signatures are computed as proposed in this paper, the author would appreciate LEWG’s feedback about the suggested additions.
Do we want to use
operator+
to join two
completion_signature
objects?
Do we want to make completion_signatures<Sigs...>
tuple-like
(where completion_signatures<Sigs...>()
behaves like
tuple<Sigs*...>()
)?
Should we drop the
transform_completion_signatures
alias template?
Should we add a
make_completion_signatures
helper function that returns an instance of a
completion_signatures
type with
its function types normalized and made unique?
Should we replace the
transform_completion_signatures
alias template with a consteval
function that does the same thing but for values?
Do we want the
invalid_completion_signature
helper function to make it easy to generate good diagnostics when
type-checking a sender fails.
Do we want the
get_child_completion_signatures
helper function to make is easy for sender adaptors to get a (properly
cv-qualified) child sender’s completion signatures?
Do we want to make the completion tag types
(set_value_t
, etc.)
constexpr
equality-comparable
with each other?
Do we want the
eptr_completion_if
variable
template, which is an object of type completion_signatures<set_error_t(std::exception_ptr)>
or completion_signatures<>
depending on a bool
template
parameter?
The design proposed in this paper has been prototyped and can be found on Compiler Explorer1.
[ Editor's note: This wording is relative to the current working draft with the addition of [P3164R3] ]
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.general] as follows: ]
? For function type
R(Args...)
, letdenote the type
NORMALIZE-SIG
(R(Args...))R(
whereremove-rvalue-reference-t
<Args>...)remove-rvalue-reference-t
is an alias template that removes an rvalue reference from a type.7 For function types
F1
andF2
denotingR1(Args1...)
andR2(Args2...)
, respectively,is
MATCHING-SIG
(F1, F2)true
if and only ifsame_as<
isR1(Args1&&...), R2(Args2&&...)
NORMALIZE-SIG(F1), NORMALIZE-SIG(F2)
>true
.8 For a subexpression
err
, letErr
bedecltype((err))
and letbe [ Editor's note: … as before ]
AS-EXCEPT-PTR
(err)
[ Editor's note: Change [execution.syn] as follows: ]
Header
<execution>
synopsis [execution.syn]namespace std::execution { … as before … template<class Sndr, class... Env> concept sender_in = see below;
template<class Sndr>
concept dependent_sender = see below;
template<class Sndr, class Rcvr> concept sender_to = see below; template<class... Ts> structtype-list
; // exposition only// [exec.getcomplsigs], completion signatures
struct get_completion_signatures_t;
[ Editor's note:inline constexpr get_completion_signatures_t get_completion_signatures {};
This alias is moved below and modified.
]template<class Sndr, class... Env>
requires sender_in<Sndr, Env...>
template<class... Ts> usingusing completion_signatures_of_t =
call-result-t
<get_completion_signatures_t, Sndr, Env...>;decayed-tuple
= tuple<decay_t<Ts>...>; // exposition only … as before … // [exec.util], sender and receiver utilities // [exec.util.cmplsig]completion signatures
template<class Fn> conceptcompletion-signature
=see below
; // exposition only template<completion-signature
... Fns> struct completion_signatures; template<class Sigs> concept{}
valid-completion-signatures
=see below
; // exposition onlystruct
dependent-sender-error
{};// exposition only
// [exec.getcomplsigs]
template<class Sndr, class... Env>
consteval auto get_completion_signatures() ->
valid-completion-signatures
auto;template<class Sndr, class... Env>
requires sender_in<Sndr, Env...>
using completion_signatures_of_t = decltype(get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>());
// [exec.util.cmplsig.trans]
template<
valid-completion-signatures
InputSignatures,
valid-completion-signatures
AdditionalSignatures = completion_signatures<>,template<class...> class SetValue =
see below
,template<class> class SetError =
see below
,
valid-completion-signatures
SetStopped = completion_signatures<set_stopped_t()>>using transform_completion_signatures = completion_signatures<
see below
>;template<
sender Sndr,
class Env = env<>,
valid-completion-signatures
AdditionalSignatures = completion_signatures<>,template<class...> class SetValue =
see below
,template<class> class SetError =
see below
,
valid-completion-signatures
SetStopped = completion_signatures<set_stopped_t()>>requires sender_in<Sndr, Env>
using transform_completion_signatures_of =
transform_completion_signatures<
completion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, Env>,
// [exec.run.loop], run_loop class run_loop; … as before … }AdditionalSignatures, SetValue, SetError, SetStopped>;
[ Editor's note: Add the following paragraph after [execution.syn] para 3 (this is moved from [exec.snd.concepts]) ]
? A type models the exposition-only concept
valid-completion-signatures
if it denotes a specialization of thecompletion_signatures
class template.
[ Editor's note: Modify [exec.snd.general] as follows: ]
1 Subclauses [exec.factories] and [exec.adapt] define customizable algorithms that return senders. Each algorithm has a default implementation. Let
sndr
be the result of an invocation of such an algorithm or an object equal to the result ([concepts.equality]), and letSndr
bedecltype((sndr))
. Letrcvr
be a receiver of typeRcvr
with associated environmentenv
of typeEnv
such thatsender_to<Sndr, Rcvr>
istrue
. For the default implementation of the algorithm that producedsndr
, connectingsndr
torcvr
and starting the resulting operation state ([exec.async.ops]) necessarily results in the potential evaluation ([basic.def.odr]) of a set of completion operations whose first argument is a subexpression equal torcvr
. LetSigs
be a pack of completion signatures corresponding to this set of completion operations, and letCS
be the type of the expressionget_completion_signatures(sndr, env)
get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env>()
. ThenCS
is a specialization of the class templatecompletion_signatures
([exec.util.cmplsig]), the set of whose template arguments isSigs
. If none of the types inSigs
are dependent on the typeEnv
, then the expressionget_completion_signatures(sndr)
get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
is well-formed and its type isCS
. If a user-provided implementation of the algorithm that producedsndr
is selected instead of the default:
(1.1) Any completion signature that is in the set of types denoted by
completion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, Env>
and that is not part ofSigs
shall correspond to error or stopped completion operations, unless otherwise specified.(1.2) If none of the types in
Sigs
are dependent on the typeEnv
, thencompletion_signatures_of_t<Sndr>
andcompletion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, Env>
shall denote the same type.
[ Editor's note: In [exec.snd.expos], insert the following paragraph after para 22 and before para 23 (moving the exposition-only alias template out of para 24 and into its own para so it can be used from elsewhere): ]
23 Let
valid-specialization
be the following alias template:template<template<class...> class T, class... Args>
valid-specialization
= requires { typename T<Args...>; }; // exposition only concept
[ Editor's note: In
[exec.snd.expos] para 23 add the mandate below, and in para 24, change
the definition of the exposition-only
basic-sender
as
follows: ]
template<class Tag, class Data = see below, class... Child> constexpr auto
make-sender
(Tag tag, Data&& data, Child&&... child);23 Mandates: The following expressions are
true
:
(23.4)
dependent_sender<Sndr> || sender_in<Sndr>
, whereSndr
isas defined below.
basic-sender
<Tag, Data, Child...>Recommended practice: When this mandate fails because
get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
would exit with an exception, implementations are encouraged to include information about the exception in the resulting diagnostic.
24 Returns: A prvalue of type
that has been direct-list-initialized with the forwarded arguments, where
basic-sender
<Tag, decay_t<Data>, decay_t<Child>...>basic-sender
is the following exposition-only class template except as noted below.namespace std::execution { template<class Tag> concept
completion-tag
= // exposition only <Tag, set_value_t> || same_as<Tag, set_error_t> || same_as<Tag, set_stopped_t>; same_astemplate<template<class...> class T, class... Args>
structconcept
valid-specialization
= requires { typename T<Args...>; }; // exposition onlydefault-impls
{ // exposition only static constexpr autoget-attrs
=see below
; static constexpr autoget-env
=see below
; static constexpr autoget-state
=see below
; static constexpr autostart
=see below
; static constexpr autocomplete
=see below
;template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; … as before …check-types
();template <class Sndr>
using
template <class Sndr, size_t I = 0> usingdata-type
= decltype(declval<Sndr>().templateget
<1>()); // exposition onlychild-type
= decltype(declval<Sndr>().templateget
<I+2>()); // exposition only … as before …template<class Sndr, class... Env>
template<class Tag, class Data, class... Child> structusing
completion-signatures-for
=see below
; // exposition onlybasic-sender
:product-type
<Tag, Data, Child...> { // exposition only using sender_concept = sender_t; usingindices-for
= index_sequence_for<Child...>; // exposition only decltype(auto) get_env() const noexcept { auto& [_, data, ...child] = *this; returnimpls-for
<Tag>::get-attrs
(data, child...); } template<decays-to
<basic-sender
> Self, receiver Rcvr> auto connect(this Self&& self, Rcvr rcvr) noexcept(see below
) ->basic-operation
<Self, Rcvr> { return {std::forward<Self>(self), std::move(rcvr)}; } template<decays-to
<basic-sender
> Self, class... Env>static consteval
auto get_completion_signatures()this Self&& self, Env&&... env
noexcept;
->
completion-signatures-for
<Self, Env...> {return {};
}; }}
[ Editor's note: In [exec.snd.expos], replace para 39 with the paragraphs shown below and renumber subsequent paragraphs: ]
39 Let
Sndr
be a (possiblyconst
-qualified) specializationbasic-sender
or an lvalue reference of such, letRcvr
be the type of a receiver with an associated environment of typeEnv
. If the typeis well-formed, let
basic-operation
<Sndr, Rcvr>op
be an lvalue subexpression of that type. Thendenotes a specialization of
completion-signatures-for
<Sndr, Env>completion_signatures
, the set of whose template arguments corresponds to the set of completion operations that are potentially evaluated ([basic.def.odr]) as a result of evaluatingop.start()
. Otherwise,is ill-formed. If
completion-signatures-for
<Sndr, Env>is well-formed and its type is not dependent upon the type
completion-signatures-for
<Sndr, Env>Env
,is well-formed and denotes the same type; otherwise,
completion-signatures-for
<Sndr>is ill-formed.
completion-signatures-for
<Sndr>template <class Sndr, class... Env>
default-impls
::check-types
(); static constexpr void? Let
FwdEnv
be a pack of the typesdecltype(
, and letFWD-ENV
(declval<Env>()))...Is
be the pack of integral template arguments of theinteger_sequence
specialization denoted by.
indices-for
<Sndr>? Effects: Equivalent to:
child-type
<Sndr, Is>, FwdEnv...>(), ...) (get_completion_signatures<template<class Tag, class Data, class... Child> template <class Sndr, class... Env>
basic-sender
<Tag, Data, Child...>::get_completion_signatures(); static consteval auto? Let
Rcvr
be the type of a receiver whose environment has typeE
, whereE
is the first type in the listEnv..., unspecified
. LetCS
be a type determined as follows:
(?.1) If the following expression is well-formed and a core constant expression:
impls-for
<Tag>::templatecheck-types
<Sndr, Env...>()let
op
be an lvalue subexpression whose type isconnect_result_t<Sndr, Rcvr>
. ThenCS
is the specialization ofcompletion_signatures
the set of whose template arguments correspond to the set of completion operations that are potentially evaluated ([basic.def.odr]) as a result of evaluatingop.start()
.(?.2) Otherwise,
CS
iscompletion_signatures<>
.? Effects: Equivalent to
impls-for
<Tag>::templatecheck-types
<Sndr, Env...>(); return CS();? Throws: An exception of an unspecified type if the expression
is ill-formed.
impls-for
<Tag>::templatecheck-types
<Sndr, Env...>()
[ Editor's note: Change
the specification of
write-env
in
[exec.snd.expos] para 40-43 as follows: ]
template<sender Sndr, queryable Env> constexpr auto
write-env
(Sndr&& sndr, Env&& env); // exposition only40
write-env
is an exposition-only sender adaptor that, when connected with a receiverrcvr
, connects the adapted sender with a receiver whose execution environment is the result of joining the queryable argumentenv
to the result ofget_env(rcvr)
.41 Let
write-env-t
be an exposition-only empty class type.42 Returns:
make-sender
(write-env-t
(), std::forward<Env>(env), std::forward<Sndr>(sndr))43 Remarks: The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forwrite-env-t
as follows:template<> struct
impls-for
<write-env-t
> :default-impls
{static constexpr auto
join-env
(const auto& state, const auto& env) noexcept {return
see below
;}
static constexpr autoget-env
= [](auto, const auto& state, const auto& rcvr) noexcept { return
see below
; };
join-env
(state, get_env(rcvr))template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
};check-types
();
- (43.1) Invocation of
returns an object
impls-for
<write-env-t
>::get-env
join-env
e
such thatdecltype(e)
modelsqueryable
and given a query objectq
, the expressione.query(q)
is expression-equivalent tostate.query(q)
if that expression is valid, otherwise,e.query(q)
is expression-equivalent to.
get_env(rcvr)
env
.query(q)
- (43.2) For type
Sndr
and packEnv
, letState
beand let
data-type
<Sndr>JoinEnv
be the packdecltype(
. Thenjoin-env
(declval<State>(), declval<Env>()))is expression-equivalent to
impls-for
<write-env-t
>::check-types
<Sndr, Env...>()get_completion_signatures<
.child-type
<Sndr>, JoinEnv...>()
[ Editor's note: Add the following new paragraphs to the end of [exec.snd.expos] ]
?? [ Editor's note: Moved from [exec.on] para 6 and modified. ]template<class... Fns>
overload-set
: Fns... { struct using Fns::operator()...; };
not-a-sender
{ struct using sender_concept = sender_t; template<class Sndr> static constexpr auto get_completion_signatures() -> completion_signatures<> { throw unspecified; } };
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.snd.concepts] para 1 as follows: ]
1 The
sender
concept … as before … to produce an operation state.namespace std::execution {
template<class Sigs>
concept
valid-completion-signatures
=see below
; // exposition onlytemplate<auto>
concept
is-constant
= true;// exposition only
template<class Sndr> conceptis-sender
= // exposition only <typename Sndr::sender_concept, sender_t>; derived_from template<class Sndr> conceptenable-sender
= // exposition onlyis-sender
<Sndr> ||is-awaitable
<Sndr,env-promise
<env<>>>; // [exec.awaitable]template<class Sndr>
consteval bool
is-dependent-sender-helper
() try {// exposition only
get_completion_signatures<Sndr>();
return false;
} catch (
dependent-sender-error
&) {return true;
}
template<class Sndr> concept sender = bool(enable-sender
<remove_cvref_t<Sndr>>) && requires (const remove_cvref_t<Sndr>& sndr) { { get_env(sndr) } ->queryable
; } && <remove_cvref_t<Sndr>> && move_constructible<remove_cvref_t<Sndr>, Sndr>; constructible_from template<class Sndr, class... Env> concept sender_in = <Sndr> && sender(queryable<Env> &&...) &&
is-constant
<get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()>requires (Sndr&& sndr, Env&&... env) {
{ get_completion_signatures(std::forward<Sndr>(sndr), std::forward<Env>(env)...) }
->
valid-completion-signatures
;};template<class Sndr>
concept dependent_sender =
sender<Sndr> && bool_constant<
template<class Sndr, class Rcvr> concept sender_to = <Sndr, env_of_t<Rcvr>> && sender_in<Rcvr, completion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, env_of_t<Rcvr>>> && receiver_ofrequires (Sndr&& sndr, Rcvr&& rcvr) { connect(std::forward<Sndr>(sndr), std::forward<Rcvr>(rcvr)); }; }is-dependent-sender-helper
<Sndr>()>::value;
[ Editor's note: Strike [exec.snd.concepts] para 3 (this para is moved to [execution.syn]): ]
3
A type models the exposition-only conceptvalid-completion-signatures
if it denotes a specialization of thecompletion_signatures
class template.
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.getcomplsigs] as follows: ]
1
get_completion_signatures
is a customization point object. Let sndr be an expression such thatdecltype((sndr))
isSndr
, and letenv
be a pack of zero or one expression. Ifsizeof...(env) == 0
istrue
, letnew_sndr
besndr
; otherwise, letnew_sndr
be the expressiontransform_sender(decltype(
. Letget-domain-late
(sndr, env...)){}, sndr, env...)NewSndr
bedecltype((new_sndr))
. Thenget_completion_signatures(sndr, env...)
is expression-equivalent to(void(sndr), void(env)..., CS())
except thatvoid(sndr)
andvoid(env)...
are indeterminately sequenced, whereCS
is:
(1.1)
decltype(new_sndr.get_completion_signatures(env...))
if that type is well-formed,(1.2) Otherwise, if
sizeof...(env) == 1
istrue
, thendecltype(new_sndr.get_completion_signatures())
if that expression is well-formed,(1.3) Otherwise,
remove_cvref_t<NewSndr>::completion_signatures
if that type is well-formed,(1.4) Otherwise, if
is
is-awaitable
<NewSndr,env-promise
<decltype((env))>...>true
, then:completion_signatures<
SET-VALUE-SIG
(await-result-type<NewSndr, env-promise<Env>>), // ([exec.snd.concepts]) set_error_t(exception_ptr), set_stopped_t()>(1.4) Otherwise,
CS
is ill-formed.
template <class Sndr, class... Env>
; consteval auto get_completion_signatures() ->
valid-completion-signatures
auto? Let
NewSndr
beSndr
ifsizeof...(Env) == 1
isfalse
; otherwise,decltype(new_sndr)
wherenew_sndr
is the following expression:transform_sender(
get-domain-late
(declval<Sndr>(), declval<Env>()...)){}, decltype( declval<Sndr>(), declval<Env>()...)? Requires:
sizeof...(Env) <= 1
istrue
.? Effects: Given the following exposition-only entities:
template<class Sndr, class... Env>
completion-signatures-result-t
= // exposition only using decltype(remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()); template<class Sndr, class... Env>dependent-sender-without-env
= // exposition only conceptcompletion-signatures-result-t
<Sndr>; }; (sizeof...(Env) == 0) && !requires { typename template<completion_signatures>has-constexpr-completions-helper
= true; // exposition only concept template<class Sndr, class... Env>has-constexpr-completions
= // exposition only concepthas-constexpr-completions-helper
< remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()>;Equivalent to:
return e;
wheree
is expression-equivalent to the following:
(?.1)
remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env...>()
ifis
has-constexpr-completions
<Sndr, Env...>true
.(?.2)
remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr>()
ifsizeof...(Env) == 1 &&
ishas-constexpr-completions
<Sndr>true
.(?.3) Otherwise,
remove_cvref_t<NewSndr>::completion_signatures
if that type is well-formed,(?.4) Otherwise,
(throw
ifdependent-sender-error
(), completion_signatures())is
dependent-sender-without-env
<Sndr, Env...>true
.(?.5) Otherwise,
(throw
ifunspecified
, completion_signatures())requires { typename
iscompletion-signatures-result-t
<Sndr, Env...>; }false
.(?.6) Otherwise:
(remove_reference_t<Sndr>::template get_completion_signatures<Sndr, Env>(),
unspecified
, throw completion_signatures())2 If
get_completion_signatures(sndr)
is well-formed and its type denotes a specialization of thecompletion_signatures
class templateis
has-constexpr-completions
<Sndr>true
, thenSndr
is a non-dependent sender type ([async.ops]).3 Given a type
Env
, ifcompletion_signatures_of_t<Sndr>
andcompletion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, Env>
are both well-formed, they shall denote the same type.4 Let
rcvr
be an rvalue whose typeRcvr
modelsreceiver
, and letSndr
be the type of a sender such thatsender_in<Sndr, env_of_t<Rcvr>>
istrue
. LetSigs...
be the template arguments of thecompletion_signatures
specialization named bycompletion_signatures_of_t<Sndr, env_of_t<Rcvr>>
. LetCSO
be a completion function. If senderSndr
or its operation state cause the expressionCSO(rcvr, args...)
to be potentially evaluated ([basic.def.odr]) then there shall be a signatureSig
inSigs...
such that
MATCHING-SIG
(decayed-typeof
<CSO>(decltype(args)...), Sig)is
true
([exec.general]).
[ Editor's note: At the very bottom of [exec.connect], change the Mandates of para 6 as follows: ]
6 The expression
connect(sndr, rcvr)
is expression-equivalent to:
(6.1)
new_sndr.connect(rcvr)
if that expression is well-formed.Mandates: The type of the expression above satisfies
operation_state
.(6.2) Otherwise,
.
connect-awaitable
(new_sndr, rcvr)Mandates:
The following are allsender<Sndr> && receiver<Rcvr>
istrue
.true
:
[ Editor's note: In [exec.read.env] para 3, make the following change: ]
3 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forread_env
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<> struct
impls-for
<decayed-typeof
<read_env>> :default-impls
{ static constexpr autostart
= [](auto query, auto& rcvr) noexcept -> void {TRY-SET-VALUE
(std::move(rcvr), query(get_env(rcvr))); };template<class Sndr, class Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();
template<class Sndr, class Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.shedule.from] para 4 and insert a new para between 6 and 7 as follows: ]
4 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forschedule_from_t
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<> struct
impls-for
<schedule_from_t> :default-impls
{ static constexpr autoget-attrs
=see below;
static constexpr autoget-state
=see below;
static constexpr autocomplete
=see below;
template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();5 The member … as before …
6 The member … as before …
template<class Sndr, class... Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void? Effects: Equivalent to:
data-type
<Sndr>>>, get_completion_signatures<schedule_result_t<FWD-ENV
(declval<Env>()))...>(); decltype(default-impls
::check-types
<Sndr, Env...>();7 Objects of the local class
state-type
… as before …
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.on] para 6 as follows: ]
6 Otherwise: Let
not-a-scheduler
be an unspecified empty class type., and letnot-a-sender
be the exposition-only type:
not-a-sender
{ struct using sender_concept = sender_t; auto get_completion_signatures(auto&&) const { return see below; } };
where the member functionget_completion_signatures
returns an object of a type that is not a specialization of thecompletion_signatures
class template.
[ Editor's note: Delete [exec.on] para 9 as follows: ]
9
Recommended practice: Implementations should use the return type ofto inform users that their usage of on is incorrect because there is no available scheduler onto which to restore execution.
not-a-sender
::get_completion_signatures
[ Editor's note: Revert the change to [exec.then] made by P3164R3, and then change [exec.then] para 4 as follows: ]
4 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forthen-cpo
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<> struct
impls-for
<decayed-typeof
<then-cpo
>> :default-impls
{ static constexpr auto complete = []<class Tag, class... Args> (auto, auto& fn, auto& rcvr, Tag, Args&&... args) noexcept -> void { if constexpr (same_as<Tag,decayed-typeof
<set-cpo
>>) {TRY-SET-VALUE
(rcvr, (std::move(fn), std::forward<Args>(args)...)); invoke} else { ()(std::move(rcvr), std::forward<Args>(args)...); Tag} };template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();
?template<class Sndr, class... Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void
(?.1) Effects: Equivalent to:
child-type
<Sndr, 0>, Env...>(); auto cs = get_completion_signatures< auto fn = []<class... Ts>(set_value_t(*)(Ts...)) {data-type
<Sndr>>, Ts...>) if constexpr (!invocable<remove_cvref_t<unspecified
; throw };for-each
(overload-set
{fn, [](auto){}}); cs.
[ Editor's note: Revert the change to [exec.let] made by P3164R3, and then change [exec.let] para 5 and insert a new para after 5 as follows: ]
5 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forlet-cpo
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<class State, class Rcvr, class... Args> void
let-bind
(State& state, Rcvr& rcvr, Args&&... args); // exposition only template<> structimpls-for
<decayed-typeof
<let-cpo
>> :default-impls
{ static constexpr autoget-state
=see below
; static constexpr autocomplete
=see below
;template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();
?template<class Sndr, class... Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void
(?.1) Effects: Equivalent to:
data-type
<Sndr>>; using LetFn = remove_cvref_t<child-type
<Sndr>, Env...>(); auto cs = get_completion_signatures<decayed-typeof
<set-cpo
>(*)(Ts...)) { auto fn = []<class... Ts>( if constexpr (!invocable<LetFn, Ts...>)unspecified
; throw else if constexpr (!sender<invoke_result_t<LetFn, Ts...>>)unspecified
; throw };for-each
(overload-set
(fn, [](auto){})); cs.
[ Editor's note: Revert the change to [exec.bulk] made by P3164R3, and then change [exec.bulk] para 3 and insert a new para after 5 as follows: ]
3 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forbulk_t
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<> struct
impls-for
<bulk_t> :default-impls
{ static constexpr autocomplete
=see below
;template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();4 The member
is … as before …
impls-for
<bulk_t>::complete
5 … as before …
?template<class Sndr, class... Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void
(?.1) Effects: Equivalent to:
child-type
<Sndr>, Env...>(); auto cs = get_completion_signatures< auto fn = []<class... Ts>(set_value_t(*)(Ts...)) {data-type
<Sndr>>, Ts...>) if constexpr (!invocable<remove_cvref_t<unspecified
; throw };for-each
(overload-set
{fn, [](auto){}}); cs.
[ Editor's note: Revert the change to [exec.split] made by P3164R3, and then change [exec.split] para 3 and insert a new para after 3 as follows: ]
3 The name
split
denotes a pipeable sender adaptor object.For a subexpressionsndr
, letSndr
bedecltype((sndr))
. Ifsender_in<Sndr,
issplit-env
>false
,split(sndr)
is ill-formed.
? The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forsplit_t
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<>
impls-for
<split_t> :default-impls
{ struct template<class Sndr>check-types
() { static constexpr voiddefault-impls
::check-types
<Sndr,split-env
>(); } }; }
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.when.all] paras 2-4 and insert two new paras after 4 as follows: ]
2 The names
when_all
andwhen_all_with_variant
denote customization point objects. Letsndrs
be a pack of subexpressions, letSndrs
be a pack of the typesdecltype((sndrs))...
, and letCD
be the typecommon_type_t<decltype(
, and letget-domain-early
(sndrs))...>CD2
beCD
ifCD
is well-formed, anddefault_domain
otherwise.. The expressionswhen_all(sndrs...)
andwhen_all_with_variant(sndrs...)
are ill-formed if any of the following is true:
- (2.3)
CD
is ill-formed.3 The expression
when_all(sndrs...)
is expression-equivalent to:(
CD()
CD2()
,make-sender
(when_all, {}, sndrs...)) transform_sender4 The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forwhen_all_t
as follows:namespace std::execution { template<> struct
impls-for
<when_all_t> :default-impls
{ static constexpr autoget-attrs
=see below
; static constexpr autoget-env
=see below
; static constexpr autoget-state
=see below
; static constexpr autostart
=see below
; static constexpr autocomplete
=see below
;template<class Sndr, class... Env>
static constexpr void
}; }check-types
();
? Let
make-when-all-env
be the following exposition-only function template:template<class Env>
make-when-all-env
(inplace_stop_source& stop_src, Env&& env) noexcept { constexpr autosee below
; return }
The following itemized list has been moved here unmodified from para 6. Returns an object
e
such that
(?.1)
decltype(e)
modelsqueryable
, and(?.2)
e.query(get_stop_token)
is expression-equivalent tostop_src.get_token()
, and(?.3) given a query object
q
with type other than cvstop_token_t
,e.query(q)
is expression-equivalent toenv.query(q)
.Let
when-all-env
be an alias template such thatdenotes the type
when-all-env
<Env>decltype(
.make-when-all-env
(declval<inplace_stop_source&>(), declval<Env>()))
?template<class Sndr, class... Env>
check-types
(); static constexpr void
(?.1) Let
Is
be the pack of integral template arguments of theinteger_sequence
specialization denoted by.
indices-for
<Sndr>(?.2) Effects: Equivalent to:
auto fn = []<class Child>() {
when-all-env
<Env>...>(); auto cs = get_completion_signatures<Child,count
<set_value_t> >= 2) if constexpr (cs.templateunspecified
; throw };child-type
<Sndr, Is>>(), ...); (fn.template operator()<(?.3) Throws: Any exception thrown as a result of evaluating the Effects, or an exception of an unspecified type when
CD
is ill-formed.
5 The member
… as before …
impls-for
<when_all_t>::get-attrs
6 The member
is initialized with a callable object equivalent to the following lambda expression:
impls-for
<when_all_t>::get-env
[]<class State, class Rcvr>(auto&&, State& state, const Receiver& rcvr) noexcept { return
see below
; }
make-when-all-env
(state.stop-src
, get_env(rcvr))
Returns an objecte
such that
7 The member
is initialized with a callable object equivalent to the following lambda expression:
impls-for
<when_all_t>::get-state
[]<class Sndr, class Rcvr>(Sndr&& sndr, Rcvr& rcvr) noexcept(e) -> decltype(e) { return e; }
where
e
is the expression::forward<Sndr>(sndr).apply(
make-state
<Rcvr>()) stdand where
make-state
is the following exposition-only class template:
template<class Sndr, class Env>
concept
max-1-sender-in
= sender_in<Sndr, Env> &&@// exposition only
enum class disposition { started, error, stopped }; // exposition only template<class Rcvr> struct make-state { template<(tuple_size_v<value_types_of_t<Sndr, Env, tuple, tuple>> <= 1);
class... Sndrs> auto operator()(auto, auto, Sndrs&&... sndrs) const { using values_tuple = see below; using errors_variant = see below; using stop_callback = stop_callback_for_t<stop_token_of_t<env_of_t<Rcvr>>, on-stop-request>; … as before …
max-1-sender-in
<env_of_t<Rcvr>>
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.when.all] para 14 as follows: ]
14 The expression
when_all_with_variant(sndrs...)
is expression-equivalent to:(
CD()
CD2()
,make-sender
(when_all_with_variant, {}, sndrs...)); transform_sender
[ Editor's note: Revert the change to [exec.stopped.opt] made by P3164R3, and make the following changes instead. ]
2 The name
stopped_as_optional
denotes a pipeable sender adaptor object. For a subexpressionsndr
, letSndr
bedecltype((sndr))
. The expressionstopped_as_optional(sndr)
is expression-equivalent to:(get-domain-early(sndr), make-sender(stopped_as_optional, {}, sndr)) transform_sender
except that
sndr
is only evaluated once.? The exposition-only class template
impls-for
([exec.snd.general]) is specialized forstopped_as_optional_t
as follows:template<>
impls-for
<stopped_as_optional_t> :default-impls
{ struct template<class Sndr, class... Env>check-types
() { static constexpr voidchild-type
<Sndr>, decltype(FWD-ENV
(declval<Env>()))...>(); auto cs = get_completion_signatures<single-sender-value-type
<Sndr, Env...>}) if constexpr (!requires {typename throw unspecified;single-sender-value-type
<Sndr, Env...>>) else if constexpr (same_as<void, throw unspecified; } };3 Let
sndr
andenv
be subexpressions such thatSndr
isdecltype((sndr))
andEnv
isdecltype((env))
. Ifis
sender-for
<Sndr, stopped_as_optional_t>false
, or if the typethen the expressionis ill-formed or
single-sender-value-type
<Sndr, Env>void
,stopped_as_optional.transform_sender(sndr, env)
is ill-formed; otherwise, ifis
has-constexpr-completions
<Sndr, Env>false
, the expressionstopped_as_optional.transform_sender(sndr, env)
is equivalent to; otherwise, it is equivalent to:
not-a-sender
()auto&& [_, _, child] = sndr; using V = single-sender-value-type<Sndr, Env>; return let_stopped( (std::forward_like<Sndr>(child), then[]<class... Ts>(Ts&&... ts) noexcept(is_nothrow_constructible_v<V, Ts...>) { return optional<V>(in_place, std::forward<Ts>(ts)...); }), []() noexcept { return just(optional<V>()); });
[ Editor's note: Change [exec.util.cmplsig] para 8 and add a new para after 8 as follows: ]
8namespace std::execution { template<
completion-signature
... Fns> struct completion_signatures {template<class Tag>
static constexpr size_t
count
=see below
;template<class Fn>
static constexpr void
for-each
(Fn&& fn) { // exposition only(std::forward<Fn>(fn)(static_cast<Fns*>(nullptr)), ...);
}
}; … as before … }
? For a type
Tag
,completion_signatures<Fns...>::count<Tag>
is initialized with the count of function types inFns...
that are of the formTag(Ts...)
whereTs
is a pack of types.
[ Editor's note: Remove subclause [exec.util.cmplsig.trans]. ]
To-Do
I would like to thank Hana Dusíková for her work making constexpr exceptions a reality for C++26. Thanks are also due to David Sankel for his encouragement to investigate using constexpr exceptions as an alternative to TMP hackery, and for giving feedback on an early draft of this paper.