Doc. no. | P0699R0 |
Date: | Revised 2017-07-14 at 21:21:37 UTC |
Project: | Programming Language C++ |
Reply to: | Marshall Clow <lwgchair@gmail.com> |
Section: 23.7.3 [variant.variant] Status: Immediate Submitter: United States Opened: 2017-02-03 Last modified: 2017-07-14
Priority: 0
View other active issues in [variant.variant].
View all other issues in [variant.variant].
View all issues with Immediate status.
Discussion:
Addresses US 113Variants cannot properly support allocators, as any assignment of a subsequent value throws away the allocator used at construction. This is not an easy problem to solve, so variant would be better served dropping the illusion of allocator support for now, leaving open the possibility to provide proper support once the problems are fully understood.
Proposed change: Strike the 8 allocator aware constructor overloads from the class definition, and strike 20.7.2.1 [variant.ctor] p34/35. Strike clause 20.7.12 [variant.traits]. Strike the specialization of uses_allocator for variant in the <variant> header synopsis, 20.7.1 [variant.general].
[2017-02-28, Kona, Casey provides wording]
[2017-06-29 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 7 positive votes on c++std-lib.]
[2017-07 Toronto Moved to Immediate]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4659.
Change 23.7.2 [variant.syn], header <variant> synopsis, as follows:
[…]// 23.7.13 [variant.traits], allocator-related traits template <class T, class Alloc> struct uses_allocator; template <class... Types, class Alloc> struct uses_allocator<variant<Types...>, Alloc>;
Change 23.7.3 [variant.variant], class template variant synopsis, as follows:
[…]// allocator-extended constructors template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&); template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, const variant&); template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, variant&&); template <class Alloc, class T> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, T&&); template <class Alloc, class T, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, in_place_type_t<T>, Args&&...); template <class Alloc, class T, class U, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, in_place_type_t<T>, initializer_list<U>, Args&&...); template <class Alloc, size_t I, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, in_place_index_t<I>, Args&&...); template <class Alloc, size_t I, class U, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&, in_place_index_t<I>, initializer_list<U>, Args&&...);
Modify 23.7.3.1 [variant.ctor] as indicated:
// allocator-extended constructors template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a); template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, const variant& v); template <class Alloc> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, variant&& v); template <class Alloc, class T> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, T&& t); template <class Alloc, class T, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, in_place_type_t<T>, Args&&... args); template <class Alloc, class T, class U, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, in_place_type_t<T>, initializer_list<U> il, Args&&... args); template <class Alloc, size_t I, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, in_place_index_t<I>, Args&&... args); template <class Alloc, size_t I, class U, class... Args> variant(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc& a, in_place_index_t<I>, initializer_list<U> il, Args&&... args);
-34- Requires: Alloc shall meet the requirements for an Allocator (20.5.3.5 [allocator.requirements]).-35- Effects: Equivalent to the preceding constructors except that the contained value is constructed with uses-allocator construction (23.10.7.2 [allocator.uses.construction]).
Modify 23.7.13 [variant.traits] as indicated:
template <class... Types, class Alloc> struct uses_allocator<variant<Types...>, Alloc> : true_type { };
-1- Requires: Alloc shall be an Allocator (20.5.3.5 [allocator.requirements]).-2- [Note: Specialization of this trait informs other library components that variant can be constructed with an allocator, even though it does not have a nested allocator_type. — end note]
Section: 30.10.15.2 [fs.op.canonical] Status: Immediate Submitter: Sergey Zubkov Opened: 2017-04-21 Last modified: 2017-07-14
Priority: 1
View all issues with Immediate status.
Discussion:
This is from editorial issue #1620:
Since the resolution of US-78 was applied (as part of P0492R2), std::filesystem::absolute(path, base) no longer exists. However, std::filesystem::canonical is still defined in terms of absolute(p, base).[2017-06-27 P1 after 5 positive votes on c++std-lib]
Davis Herring: This needs to be P1 — due to a wording gap in P0492R2, 2 out of the 3 overloads of filesystem::canonical() have bad signatures and are unimplementable.
[2017-07-14, Toronto, Davis Herring provides wording]
[2017-07-14, Toronto, Moved to Immediate]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4659.
Edit 30.10.6 [fs.filesystem.syn] as indicated:
path canonical(const path& p, const path& base = current_path()); path canonical(const path& p, error_code& ec);path canonical(const path& p, const path& base, error_code& ec);
Edit 30.10.15.2 [fs.op.canonical] as indicated:
path canonical(const path& p, const path& base = current_path()); path canonical(const path& p, error_code& ec);path canonical(const path& p, const path& base, error_code& ec);-1- Effects: Converts p, which must exist, to an absolute path that has no symbolic link, dot, or dot-dot elements in its pathname in the generic format.
-2- Returns: A path that refers to the same file system object as absolute(p, base).For the overload without a base argument, base is current_path(). SignaturesThe signature with argument ec returns path() if an error occurs. […]