From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Sat Dec  7 08:02:50 2024
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 55519357068; Sat,  7 Dec 2024 08:02:50 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from tmsmtp03oc.mail2world.com (tmsmtp03oc.mail2world.com [209.67.128.156])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E3356B63
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sat,  7 Dec 2024 08:02:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail pickup service by tmsmtp03oc.mail2world.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Fri, 6 Dec 2024 23:02:44 -0800
auth-sender:billlong@centurylink.net
Received: from 98.147.21.124 unverified ([98.147.21.124]) by tmsmtp03oc.mail2world.com with Mail2World SMTP Server; 
	Fri, 06 Dec 2024 23:02:43 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: [J3] [SC22WG5.6630] 2025 WG5/J3 meeting in Berkeley
From: Bill Long <billlong@centurylink.net>
In-Reply-To: <20241207005611.05D6E357070@www.open-std.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 21:02:42 -1000
Cc: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>,
 Gary Klimowicz <gak@dancingbear.dev>,
 "Brady, Christopher" <C.S.Brady@warwick.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C22594B-3F82-4547-AD0D-9E328F83E0D7@centurylink.net>
References: <AM8PR01MB7945CE64880A36DE1F3AB4F8E8312@AM8PR01MB7945.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
 <a84e1767-8c65-4f4d-be6e-1a11c2a606f9@stevelionel.com>
 <AM8PR01MB7945375E84B0EEC231F98796E8312@AM8PR01MB7945.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
 <20241206235331.5C35D357007@www.open-std.org>
 <20241207005611.05D6E357070@www.open-std.org>
To: General J3 interest list <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A006370.6753F314.002B,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=mail2world.com; s=dev; c=simple/simple;
	q=dns/txt; t=1733554964; h=from;
	bh=RaoJlC9B7MNLh/qIZj8kg7KzPo8PTFioFDQrZtlqOZ4=;
	b=Eue7+TtcPlaasW8Ip2wHjacGTIOwCvZm6+npgxFhjA4DXdBiK/dzHEuLleH3nEuWtkUhrAEiRM8
	cvnC536gCVHxM/AWDpc4j7Y3CUfX1EnBkXjFEg8OrwAXnSYlVsHTWmGT7Fdto9xl3uDyGM0hw5sCJ
	QI75huzyeNoxIAXm0W9kFJznTH1ap/V32LnR2CQftrQPP+Wdo7vpG63CDD9vxNeoeJH1NcZ3RdDva
	LAuy5FWuWCi5oSb17CDxIorpqadECeRdvtLG5MeQtJORvRjmQbf3ArNNjYXx3JVM2pmwL/e9ni5JJ
	ra4SAvCyvGOMYVkTR2HLOT1pzoZFRHwy10DA==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2024 07:02:44.0993 (UTC) FILETIME=[041D4710:01DB4876]
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk



> On Dec 6, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Gary Klimowicz via J3 =
<j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
>=20
> It=E2=80=99s not my weekend yet, so here=E2=80=99s my take.
>=20
> I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I will go along =
whatever is best for the whole group.
>=20
> In person in the UK is much better for me than remote from the US West =
Coast.
>=20
> Berkeley is always acceptable to me as well. Facilities, hosts, and =
Berkeley are all great. But only if the non-US folk can attend in force.

I agrree with Gary that Berkeley has been  a great meeting place for =
many reasons.  But then, Las Vegas proved highly desirable as well, yet =
has fallen off =E2=80=9Cthe list=E2=80=9D.   .

If we want a =E2=80=9Cnon-US=E2=80=9D location, I might remind people =
that we had a meeting in Canada hosted by IBM that wen well ((n my =
opinion). Given the recent spate of layoffs in the US computer industry, =
we might want to avoid such hosts.=20
I=E2=80=99m not sure if we can argue that Honolulu is =E2=80=9Cnon-US=E2=80=
=9D, but it would be a iot shorter trip for those coming from Japan,=20

Cheers,
Bill



>=20
> I am neutral on dates, except that I know some folk can=E2=80=99t meet =
on the Fourth of July. (If it=E2=80=99s WG5 only, maybe only meet three =
days? I remain neutral about all that, too.)
>=20
> Gary
>=20
>> On Dec 6, 2024, at 15:53, Steve Lionel via J3 =
<j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> The issue here is that you're not a member of the J3 list - I've =
added you there as an acceptable sender. I'm unsure what the WG5 list is =
doing (it uses the J3 list as a subset.)
>>=20
>> It looks as if one flies to Birmingham (BHX) and takes a train to =
Coventry - is that right?
>>=20
>> I'd appreciate more responses from possible attendees as to whether =
they'd rather meet at Warwick (Coventry) than Berkeley for this next =
meeting. I understand it is now the weekend, so let's try to have this =
sorted by the 12th.
>>=20
>> Steve
>>=20
>> On 12/6/2024 6:07 PM, Brady, Christopher wrote:
>>> Right, I've made sure that all of the lists are included this time. =
Looking back I still had the WG5 list, but I had lost the other two =
lists. If anyone spots that it hasn't appeared anywhere could you please =
forward it?
>>>=20
>>> You're right that these are teaching rooms, but I am afraid that =
moving into term time rather limits what is available. None of the =
furniture is fixed down so it can be reconfigured to have people facing =
each other but I know that it isn't as good a solution as a proper =
conference facility would be.
>>>=20
>>> I don't have very much more room for maneuver on the rooms since it =
is quite hard to get four rooms that are at all close together and about =
the right size in term time. I've done preliminary reservations on those =
rooms and can hold them for a couple of weeks, so I think that that has =
to represent the best that I can offer at Warwick. If the overall =
consensus is that LBL would be better then I'll release the reservations =
and if there is interest in moving back out of the US in 2026 then I can =
probably get something a bit more conference-centre-ish together for =
then.
>>>=20
>>> Chris
>>> From: Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
>>> Sent: 06 December 2024 10:12 PM
>>> To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>>> Cc: Brady, Christopher <C.S.Brady@warwick.ac.uk>
>>> Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] [J3] [ukfortran] [SC22WG5.6621] 2025 WG5/J3 =
meeting in Berkeley
>>> =20
>>> I don't think the general WG5 or J3 list saw this.
>>>=20
>>> 24 people is probably workable for the "plenary" room, 14-16 for the =
breakout rooms is plenty.  However, looking at the videos it seems that =
each of these rooms are set up for lectures (unsurprisingly), and it's =
not clear if we could reconfigure the tables so that we could see each =
other, as the tables are attached to one wall.
>>>=20
>>> I think the June 23 week would work better.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject:	Re: [EXTERNAL] [J3] [ukfortran] [SC22WG5.6621] 2025 =
WG5/J3 meeting in Berkeley
>>> Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2024 19:57:32 +0000
>>> From:	Brady, Christopher <C.S.Brady@warwick.ac.uk>
>>> To:	Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>, WG5 List =
<sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I've talked to some people and I have managed to find four suitable =
rooms in the week starting the 23rd June 2025, so I could offer the same =
basic plans in that week if this date would be better for people? The =
only limitation is that the largest room that I've been able to get is =
for 24 people, and the other three rooms are for 14, 14 and 16 people. =
If these numbers (or anything else) look like they will be a problem =
then I'm afraid that I am happy to withdraw and offer to host in 2026.
>>>=20
>>> If you want to see the rooms for suitability then they are
>>> =
https://warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/av/lecturerooms/roominf=
ormation/fab105
>>> =
https://warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/av/lecturerooms/roominf=
ormation/fab106
>>> =
https://warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/av/lecturerooms/roominf=
ormation/fab108
>>> =
https://warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/av/lecturerooms/roominf=
ormation/fab109
>>>=20
>>> If the rooms really are unsuitable, then do please say so.
>>>=20
>>> Chris
>>> From: Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
>>> Sent: 06 December 2024 7:10 PM
>>> To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>>> Cc: Brady, Christopher <C.S.Brady@warwick.ac.uk>
>>> Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] [J3] [ukfortran] [SC22WG5.6621] 2025 WG5/J3 =
meeting in Berkeley
>>> =20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject:	Re: [EXTERNAL] [J3] [ukfortran] [SC22WG5.6621] 2025 =
WG5/J3 meeting in Berkeley
>>> Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:08:44 -0500
>>> From:	Reuben D. Budiardja <reubendb@ornl.gov>
>>> To:	General J3 interest list <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
>>> CC:	Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Thanks to UK for offering to host us; I'm supportive of preserving =
US - non-US pattern as it would help strengthening engagements from all =
NBs.
>>>=20
>>> I'd note that the first week in the list would overlap with a US =
holiday (Independence day).
>>>=20
>>> I have potential conflicts with the late July and early August =
dates; Also early August is back to school for us and I'd very much like =
to avoid traveling.
>>>=20
>>> Is the earlier week in June that Steve originally proposed for =
Berkeley (week of June 23) simply not available?
>>>=20
>>> Best,
>>> Reuben
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 12/5/24 20:44, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote:
>>>> Malcolm alerted me to the fact that this message from Chris Brady =
didn't make it to the J3 list. Normally, if a non-member submits to that =
list, it is held for moderation, but that did not happen here, so I =
don't quite know what happened. I don't have Chris Brady's email =
address, either, so he can't see this reply! (Nathan, please forward!)
>>>>=20
>>>> Unfortunately, the list of weeks available that Chris offers don't =
contain any I think are workable (at least I can't make any of them). =
Does anyone disagree?
>>>>=20
>>>> Steve
>>>>=20
>>>> From: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org> On =
Behalf Of Brady, Christopher
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 10:19 PM
>>>> To: Nathan Sircombe <Nathan.Sircombe@arm.com>; General J3 interest =
list <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
>>>> Cc: Bill Long <billlong@centurylink.net>; WG5 List =
<sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>>>> Subject: [ukfortran] [SC22WG5.6621] [J3] 2025 WG5/J3 meeting in =
Berkeley
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Hello. As Nathan mentioned on Tuesday, I have been looking at =
getting things sorted so that we can offer to host it at Warwick =
University. I've managed to get approval for us to host it with a few (I =
hope minor) caveats if people are interested. Basically the restrictions =
are
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>     Warwick does have some lovely conference facilities, but on =
this notice, I can't put enough money on the budget for booking them. =
We'd have to use rooms in one of the academic departments. I've managed =
to get "in principle" reservation for up to 4 suitably sized rooms in =
the brand new, award winning Faculty of Arts building. All of the rooms =
have projectors, good network facilities and built in presenter =
computers. We can get USB connected video conferencing gear, so there =
shouldn't be any problems with video links, but there isn't a dedicated =
video conferencing suite. We do have public wireless internet available =
to anyone on site.
>>>>=20
>>>> 2.                  Because of having to use teaching rooms it =
would have to be one of the following weeks
>>>> 30th June to 4th July
>>>> 7th July to 11th July
>>>> 28th July to 1st August
>>>> 4th August to 8th August
>>>> 11th August to 15th August
>>>> 18th August to 22nd August
>>>> 25th August to 29th August
>>>> 1st September to 5th September
>>>> 8th September to 12th September
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> The two missing weeks in July are graduation, so if they are the =
only possible dates for people then they are available, but they would =
need people to book hotel rooms etc. early because of how busy the =
campus gets. Given how things work at Warwick, the week of the 7th July =
would be simplest, but if people are interested in this suggestion in =
general then I could put out a poll for people to select when would be =
best. It would be best if I booked rooms etc. by early-ish in January, =
but this isn't a terribly fast timescale.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>     We can provide all of the usual features like coffees, lunches =
etc. and we will able to offer a conference dinner included as well. I =
know that some people have rules that they have to work within on =
accepting hospitality etc. and we can take payment for the conference =
dinners separately in these cases.
>>>>=20
>>>>     We can provide rooms in the on campus conference accommodation =
blocks where we should be able to offer an "internal" discount code that =
will give you B&B prices of =C2=A355 for single rooms and =C2=A370 for =
double/twin rooms. These are our conference centre rooms, not the =
student halls and I believe that it includes parking costs. We can help =
people with booking into other hotels if they want and there are several =
within easy travelling distance of the university, but we can't block =
book any of them because our policy is to only offer off campus =
accommodation if we can't offer on campus. If people do want to stay off =
campus then there are good transport links to campus by bus, taxi and =
car. There is a charge for parking on campus, but it can be booked in =
advance online, or paid on the day by phone or parking app.
>>>>=20
>>>> 5.                  While Warwick is a campus university and offers =
all of the usual facilities like restaurants, a sports centre and a =
small supermarket, it is also a ten minute bus ride from either Coventry =
or Kenilworth, so you are not dependent on the facilities on campus.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> If this is of interest to people, please let me know and I can sort =
out about dates and then finalise arrangements. Similarly, if there is =
anything that I have missed, please let me know.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Chris Brady
>>>>=20
>>>> Senior Research Software Engineer
>>>>=20
>>>> Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform
>>>>=20
>>>> University of Warwick
>>>>=20
>>>> CV4 7AL
>>>>=20
>>>> United Kingdom
>=20

Bill Long
billlong@centurylink.net


