From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Feb 27 15:27:24 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 3D515356D5E; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:27:24 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (mail-vk1-f175.google.com [209.85.221.175]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D969A356D18 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:27:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4ce9bfffa19so642753e0c.1 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:27:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stevelionel.com; s=google; t=1709044042; x=1709648842; darn=open-std.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mU/7hpkGbrHe9oW6yO9HhA1I9qgyMs6O2XxVIRiPFkA=; b=ss0+YWUjQGVZQMgHFzIhRHhctGTsviWW/dTFrDhdXNXsBj0k9ADFtLtCqXv2tfPmjq oWGcMeIw19R+vL+b9fcNAuIkKA7MqURZWrSsV9EP1xmqf0nILmnFECRQDF4O+ikKWtTi ggZ9dBPKlj8Dc/gjP5VxcJ7DucMs6HTXVhJl4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709044042; x=1709648842; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mU/7hpkGbrHe9oW6yO9HhA1I9qgyMs6O2XxVIRiPFkA=; b=u2Sz81xrol4jdTCW/gjose5+vCTOG6ltRWgvgZAeNXN0GuuWRPMFYgsZEgD0rWeryJ SRnXbIwJY9HCJNz38irsfhvImOWr31zViy0goLUqpiOqSmW501ilU8nqEm23GV3edmDE W0VYNlgU71pxd4mgKdO/N40FrrysEa/9/k4vuKsQXLGL9MY9JIS7QUUiTvbGELqMtavW VAUJG2E4f/SGapQ3qYvh+2D/1M6/6KQ+vN0Vs/S7AbsQdNymRlWs5/hGRosVyL0oEdnN 1/UKYrFlt1L/ctAPHpWpB+O569viAXMgjJ/PLN7IoD9XuAItMPBVKILwEmJp4agJBbtZ cNZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzWkoK/j6Bzupj57/2oxHK4j8zOb/YgJNtAcy+XkKHskToaBe+Z tWw7qi3+2v6l/RLolRtlsFTdWzegzxeDBkTcTI6WesWfWyTAReAv+fqyHGIjHJIWUZ4Q5kjW/oi chHuFH7hVSyR+dbgrsTKo4BDOHEKTRpZPxmKeAZThKVxlcakF X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkL5YXyweKMnD8qXKFJZLO1QGmrh+R0SbyrgwQK6rzLjf9eLPw7uSWooM2BeLUp6nPSFyH8d3discJqEB3ogI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:c701:0:b0:4c0:2abe:d585 with SMTP id x1-20020a1fc701000000b004c02abed585mr6395275vkf.6.1709044042115; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:27:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Steve Lionel Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:27:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [J3] [SC22WG5.6549] REAL kinds for ERF, e.g. To: WG5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009539206125dd334" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --00000000000009539206125dd334 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 3:00=E2=80=AFAM Jeff Hammond via J3 < j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote: > When it says =E2=80=9Ctype real=E2=80=9D below, is it implicit that all R= EAL kinds > supported by the implementation are supported by ERF? If an implementati= on > supports REAL(2), REAL(4), REAL(8) and REAL(16), one would expect ERF to > work for all of them, right? > I would expect that, yes. Steve --00000000000009539206125dd334 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 3:00=E2=80=AFAM Jeff Hammond via J3 <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wr= ote:

= When it says =E2=80=9Ctype real=E2=80=9D below, is it implicit that all REA= L kinds supported by the implementation are supported by ERF?=C2=A0 If an i= mplementation supports REAL(2), REAL(4), REAL(8) and REAL(16), one would expect ERF to work for all of them, right?


I would expect that= , yes.

Steve
= --00000000000009539206125dd334--