From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Aug  9 01:24:16 2023
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id BB7C6359261; Wed,  9 Aug 2023 01:24:16 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail-qt1-f180.google.com (mail-qt1-f180.google.com [209.85.160.180])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A3B3591F0
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed,  9 Aug 2023 01:24:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4055bc3cdd8so46867001cf.1
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=stevelionel.com; s=google; t=1691537055; x=1692141855;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
         :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=YyEMOUdWWe8ZMazI+SVMVDCrOJOGTri6MT56bOut6Rs=;
        b=vVtYoSgXrOg9kYMfGbbnNK6qwOcndoFLc6LO3RxQPvCYcMoNbejUZguwd5CaLYsz0K
         jQoxFeo1uy60HblSL0igboriW6jLfoWxfyW0AvF19dcsfHQf/4633ycjZ66GIDjhd6fI
         kZGISjEu8BH/jVYpMh7Z9JvRs1bzxp/BYwqbo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691537055; x=1692141855;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
         :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=YyEMOUdWWe8ZMazI+SVMVDCrOJOGTri6MT56bOut6Rs=;
        b=lLPnUCC5ZmnCgZ23aqeA/eOF/oLoyA1NRVy+4bT2r2d8H/cSbamqQabKQbWUZftvOw
         TVVoBzp0aPCxKgzV0gBeJpvwa65sUIc/m9I+jtd0itr9Am7vFdYGg7InTxhA2so0kpPD
         9dT1HjFhHFgofN3FL4QWNzvctt+kyYPEgEOMgTyOvlA1/0sYkeD69kQJ0KKJa+Lfo1W4
         RBzCZrmx4v1uF0Hi+x1rddDcLqSYa5WT1EYFBRWCxBn7yV936ar21PPik3kLnBAnOKkl
         hK75HGRtvqHDHyZNlB3kv86kMVuQTSNr5zoJzSoJTCrwYQFRCe/OZMncZHVBLK/M67Pu
         gGmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz93fkKtf7DVM97i+FjKrY0HMuUoi9opXEJePnbErNGw7dQm2cT
	vIibtNHwUkB3gyVK5UcZ9N7q05y2FNYGn/QToZbUdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0Z7ydKHTCCyeh/gY44bzzcxwzn3bqg3EGMqkOFYIV//PtBLg9Ja5xltQ3TFAVu3R/XYYl8w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:13d3:b0:403:e7e4:d631 with SMTP id p19-20020a05622a13d300b00403e7e4d631mr1665260qtk.50.1691537055025;
        Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] ([216.212.3.233])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h22-20020a05620a13f600b00767b7375eadsm3626431qkl.39.2023.08.08.16.24.14
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3d568661-2e13-c2df-3150-a1d62a5206ca@stevelionel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 19:24:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Subject: Re: [J3] [SC22WG5.6471] Ballot has started!
Content-Language: en-US
To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20230808141637.4E98535922A@www.open-std.org>
 <631fc2859190e7feea5dff0f731ec8a6af113d23.camel@sbcglobal.net>
From: Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
In-Reply-To: <631fc2859190e7feea5dff0f731ec8a6af113d23.camel@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/8/2023 7:18 PM, Van Snyder via J3 wrote:
>
> Every Ada standard has always had paragraph numbers. Do they have a 
> blanket exemption, or do they have to beg permission every time too?
>
All the previous Fortran standards have had paragraph numbers as well. 
This is a recent (this year) pronouncement from ISO, so, yes, absent any 
change in the rules, Ada would need to request permission to include 
paragraph numbers. More, I was told earlier that ISO might grant 
paragraph numbers for a DIS, but not for the published standard. I think 
that many of the ISO editorial rules (some not written down) were 
developed with the notion that ISO standards are relatively small, which 
of course is not the case for programming languages.

Steve

