From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Feb 1 18:45:16 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id EA5F9358FD7; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:45:15 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 482 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 18:45:15 CET Received: from ms11p00im-qufo17291301.me.com (ms11p00im-qufo17291301.me.com [17.58.38.42]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3F8358FC4 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:45:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1675273032; bh=kkrjwhZIQAFehFhHD1h949ZCW2YmtQFYF1aLzX8+Eh0=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=tKbJ5kKWteMNV6dCu+lKq7Lmr63eOgTfbTS4W8VdBK/Rf+UykZLPqyj9Db2XdjyZW 8IPTQQLhMckoOCdtB6o9GEku1pBT17m5Ar2jv15ADWsBspiZ1W9jlspAmgoW8RXCnn 99bDBdynj+S2c1/gdtrZnlU0Nfz3ZGi+9ExbDDdTo6m8EyizqQz6zyOw049AsqD+P9 hZobRcURWCwRpyV+9ONGPBJCsT+YfcMilW3JZxCV8bmG9x9oy49Ry3m/1yUQEHy5d3 ozSPcTHzdJRSkIDrhKGAQKCyVZuVlA2bbmev3MQlkztQtSRY/EiVp5SzVZdz/2B9s3 SrmrAdG1RB/aQ== Received: from davids-imac.home (ms11p00im-dlb-asmtpmailmevip.me.com [17.57.154.19]) by ms11p00im-qufo17291301.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 844C09404DB for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) Subject: Re: [SC22WG5.6423] F2023 DIS ballot results and comments From: d.muxworthy@icloud.com In-Reply-To: <20230201152213.D1BFB358FD7@www.open-std.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:37:08 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: David Muxworthy Message-Id: <96493158-2333-468E-A90A-33203C3AB12E@icloud.com> References: <20230201152213.D1BFB358FD7@www.open-std.org> To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: _X_g0Vnr399-jecn2aA-3r0ibm5Wuwqr X-Proofpoint-GUID: _X_g0Vnr399-jecn2aA-3r0ibm5Wuwqr X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.425,18.0.816,17.0.605.474.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-01-18=5F01:2022-01-14=5F01,2022-01-18=5F01,2020-01-23?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F02_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=931 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2302010151 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > The argument against line numbers is that, especially when the = document is translated, they can change. Does anyone have strong = opinions about whether we should put line numbers back in the official = standard? I'd like to keep the paragraph numbers and don't care about = line numbers. Unlike line numbers paragraph numbers remain invariant with different = font sizes (mentioned by ITTF in the DIS comments), page sizes and page = margins as well as in any translation. I vote to keep paragraph numbers = and not to have line numbers in the versions going outside the Fortran = committees. David