From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Jun 28 22:53:32 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id A81433589FB; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 22:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com (mail-qt1-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598AC358993 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 22:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9so14561555qtx.8 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YEDgH93iZEA6cmma3xegXJUYXQZmVRv/U1FNWMOgfgE=; b=SwPGz0PtWTGPH2BRkXtjSBPYEhJFJiQXKspxt5NfB+WBGYbu+lsz4kswC8D6dd1Q6I pCEIek+Cl3HKeHecWq40wvU12VhnDtV9JMrQ7nSPjBM+62SDRUKZz3YH1itZ0r8KkFQa YVEfpwmsvdYNUDvYo3DdssULvtu75cxYYUk46klNta+Yd7lTYwyAcxATV04rLnQ3vmjO ShGIdzV8Ybnazb83VC6zDrw6Dbf09KjgSFM1vq8r9fc2xl/c2esmFGRSehdKU2sS8ci3 WqT4P9nMM+/PUlk7w/jA2A2s4Ts8zuJbgZnwnCVYPmFnjX2IWBoMYDGEOxCdXOlLzPSd jJVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YEDgH93iZEA6cmma3xegXJUYXQZmVRv/U1FNWMOgfgE=; b=tQQ9IIA0PLoIoEwPq/A9txdxjJzshJrB9HPwpp+4LajUc/CpRqBkeZUTPDrIwq33BZ m5E7aIDMOcLdlBIC82ss8bXlKlG5MI5bknjWASLAaIRfbRJl/iefFcL4Yq52R9E3lgD3 jt1LyxOXbXQMwPvA4CT6E8i9Xjxtef5tFxTA0O55dCsBISrZbGwQy5AVWX+lnMpZPaMv z1gp5yQY7GXJNoduqTltDuRGzft8H2Pzl0pCbmyBRGUuX0PIiH39FtPwccHlbuu4N4py fypqzDYxVSfgm+UnLxa9jiirZjf+qtV3hkHfh/HOYFszOLWFPKsH4BWSwIlrAu3QhCLv mMYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XYI9t14cPDYZ2tFEhS4qS0aOPvQw8VZzrxvTgoQk6RLGcvNzO C56KvOTd2qY3ppHXKCnSyxyIWvxUjP8fuAUqpTNi3jDF2npNIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKN0tTaFMqAcsHo+03NfBxiCx25gUSKr5egFJhkaniW7GtZOn7qkAmYi73wGDA3D2lEWgGHXOusttU1CLNhS8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:65d3:: with SMTP id t19mr8500926qto.157.1624913610890; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:53:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Milan Curcic Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:53:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Conditional expressions poll results To: General J3 interest list , WG5 List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009160a705c5d9aee7" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --0000000000009160a705c5d9aee7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi J3 & WG5, Here are the results of the Discourse poll about F202X Conditional Expressions: https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/poll-fortran-202x-conditional-expressions-syntax/1425 Summary follows: *Turnout* * *82* people voted * *98* total votes were cast' *Results* The keyword form: *46%* Other: Do not add this feature, or, pursue alternative forms: *43%* The arrow (->) form: *24%* The ? form: *4%* *Comments* * No single proposed syntax received the majority vote in this poll * Of the three syntaxes proposed between 21-157 and 21-159, the keyword form received most support (46%) and the ? form the least (4%). The arrow (->, 21-159) received moderate support * Significant fraction of votes (43%) requested not adding this feature, or, pursuing alternative syntaxes * Among the alternative syntaxes proposed in the comments, majority expressed preference for an intrinsic function form like ifthen or extended merge (paper 21-165). * More polls like this are needed to inform the committees on the community preferences. I look forward to the discussions today. Cheers, Milan --0000000000009160a705c5d9aee7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi J3 & WG5,

Here are the results o= f the Discourse poll about F202X Conditional Expressions:






Oth= er: Do not add this feature, or, pursue alternative forms:=C2=A043%<= /div>
The arrow (->) form:=C2=A024%
The ? form:=C2= =A04%

Comments

=
* No single proposed syntax received the majority vote in this p= oll
* Of the three syntaxes proposed between 21-157 and 21-159, t= he keyword form received most support (46%) and the ? form the least (4%). = The arrow (->, 21-159) received moderate support
* Significant= fraction of votes (43%) requested not adding this feature, or, pursuing al= ternative syntaxes
* Among the alternative syntaxes proposed in t= he comments, majority expressed preference for an intrinsic function form l= ike=C2=A0ifthen=C2=A0or extended=C2=A0merge=C2=A0(pap= er 21-165).
* More polls like this are needed to inform th= e committees on the community preferences.

I look = forward to the discussions today.

Cheers,
Milan

=
--0000000000009160a705c5d9aee7--