From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Sep  3 18:30:33 2020
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id A961E3587F1; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:30:33 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mr85p00im-ztdg06011801.me.com (mr85p00im-ztdg06011801.me.com [17.58.23.199])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550FB357295
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 18:30:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com;
	s=1a1hai; t=1599150630;
	bh=Mc3ztbStZ0pJlvUSPFBmrXsi04BVCJjTA7R455MYH3I=;
	h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;
	b=LlJ4csD8WTq2ebbzLf30fnXfyc072RiJfzplvZmyrRUxT7poyaBbwzcuRYGlRfvfF
	 UOBGqDPRvxlWvuo+aQCorG3Yh9kH/de8e4NPuY+mrkILxmE5HwAE1XW0GwTUJ7zGzI
	 px3eChWTZO0N1cVNlt9fQCJdHyBaKTTQIbAlIfw3CgCtsLdBgaZZa5ISeuF+QyrMGh
	 QVGCjGLtI1X9y21Is71tE5ikac+Rt79IPRgygWUXZsSZmIgLq7QCsO8TuCEcpkbNPg
	 qyz0y3PHXkOlODEhwZKlgcZJz6dkK1aOdqdbiHJiZgJNx+qW72FF+tYUm66TCVWO5E
	 Qdm/5wnzG2jRQ==
Received: from davids-imac.home (host86-144-29-33.range86-144.btcentralplus.com [86.144.29.33])
	by mr85p00im-ztdg06011801.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AD2BC08B7
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu,  3 Sep 2020 16:30:30 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.6\))
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.6284) SC22 Resolutions
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@icloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200901164121.7F3CD3588BC@www.open-std.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:30:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Message-Id: <53685E9F-0131-49F7-A2FD-A51EC194A107@icloud.com>
References: <20200901164121.7F3CD3588BC@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.6)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687
 definitions=2020-09-03_10:2020-09-03,2020-09-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0
 mlxlogscore=626 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2006250000 definitions=main-2009030154
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Steve did well to stop the large WGs imposing their needs, mainly
concerns about hotel costs, onto the smaller ones like Fortran and
Cobol.  It seemed to be taken for granted that full remote
participation should be allowed in future but there was no discussion
about sensibly facilitating participants from very different time
zones; it was however mentioned that being away from one's usual work
environment could be beneficial.  But it is not a case of one size
fits all.  There is a huge difference between short administrative
meetings like the SC22 plenary (5 hours' business spread over two days
plus 1.5 hours for the drafting committee) where essentially nothing
new comes up during the meeting, and the long, creative technical
meetings traditionally held by WG5/J3.

As Steve says, Fortran will have to devise a remote method of working
during the emergency but I hope that face-to-face meetings remain the
norm in the long run.

David Muxworthy