From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Apr 29 20:17:06 2020
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 1E7D53568A1; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4BD3566A9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:17:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1])
	by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03TIFTk4101942
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:17:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=subject : from :
 reply-to : to : in-reply-to : references : content-type : date :
 message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=InSight1906;
 bh=NM+zcrYHQW8sllogqUhKn6UEo+1WdE/X32Keqc9Q40k=;
 b=4sRhj1r2ghlNnDlSeNVNuTo10phgJk9J06ciY8S6FajE52iF27ag2zUwC6z9f2j8Chz1
 jUxjnvCescvG3rmr9lqGnBgYQmiwMhsaszRA6EUX74DfKYMPW/foFNq83jOyVSVbGx8q
 2u2CKRsLr/Rq/bZPzyJ0LXR1zIc9FWjO9cYH7M3ukFK6N9Y/FDZUZ3KV7tbrDWqyfTPX
 2mnEuKYJLz34QDbYp5SPFUDFby0khuMScasqYrbRyZ1MFb03si0JnY24LfWefVwimtdL
 TpNvdFOdd/ntiSAbUpuv8nqoLMeZzw4PhbXIQqaCBkNkwwgH0GVNORd/CzZ5bLzlkpzr 4A== 
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.52])
	by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 30pv8c3dqp-1
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:17:02 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (097-090-007-013.res.spectrum.com [97.90.7.13])
	(authenticated (0 bits))
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 03TIH1QV024210
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:17:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [J3] (SC22WG5.6192) [EXTERNAL] RE: [ukfortran] October meeting
 visa invitation letter
From: Van Snyder <van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200429154405.594C13568A1@www.open-std.org>
References: <20200428004737.19A4F9DB145@www.open-std.org>
	 <AF9A8AE5-6590-429D-96EE-A2731DDD8CD3@arm.com>
	 <20200428114456.5CCDA3568A1@www.open-std.org>
	 <999548a1-9f82-418c-b8be-1fd87f94d3be@www.fastmail.com>
	 <20200428172340.851A13568A1@www.open-std.org>
	 <20200428195502.E072C3568BB@www.open-std.org>
	 <5a392c04-ddab-46e6-8024-ae89b8658d29@www.fastmail.com>
	 <20200428225409.F33B13587B3@www.open-std.org>
	 <CALzYdaLuhYNaqrSgd5pGjXkCHF4-_AW4F6kPnwL8KEfA3E0iYg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20200429083749.4E7369DB117@www.open-std.org>
	 <20200429151053.9A3643568A1@www.open-std.org>
	 <20200429154405.594C13568A1@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:17:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1588184220.18613.441.camel@van.snyder>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-37.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: 097-090-007-013.res.spectrum.com [97.90.7.13]
X-Source-Sender: van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676
 definitions=2020-04-29_09:2020-04-29,2020-04-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=687 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2004290140
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 15:34 +0000, Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) via J3
wrote:
> I doubt anyone on this list is wed to GitHub....

I was invited to join a different GitHub several years ago, but couldn't
get anything to work. Documentation and advice were hard to come by.
It's probably better now, but I haven't tried.

> And to compare MS to nuclear weapons is a bit of a stretch in any
> event.

Mentioning two topics in the same message isn't "comparing."


