From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Apr 29 13:31:49 2020
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E09E29DB116; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C343566A9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id u127so1632126wmg.1
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=cJBhYO4220FJXIjMLNGQptbuWdaNmCqfvwjGbOXB804=;
        b=uncb0NZxnLeZ+8+UtFoVm+v9BlcJ5iy6IIWhRF1vaoS3TRO1Od9XiXVWu6QwnxK5LB
         dDKKvw0GeFVLoiiiKDgmtMv+4TKBdLirFLvcS9ii0vKrrjrNcBrFbQJeuji6GZlXqL35
         2BclkOlee3ifDEe3XU+TmlPJHPwQU4XF57pRZQOLNLqqVixuqAQ2DrcG1cT2DBt8eK9z
         4P5uRbmziPZAIXpKA/N4dW42KGADJ7swx1Ve19uq3sRzzaMuyeIeuZgZeM91jeuq4sE/
         sQsovLkqgXvyNtkKnmM6FZql52RUTz9tfUpz5bRyhwz8FMd+rEeKEg2DD/Q/6hjivog6
         SRnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=cJBhYO4220FJXIjMLNGQptbuWdaNmCqfvwjGbOXB804=;
        b=T35EZOWpimsbyYzw97i9FNEybctQ7uPPFl9GMXf/hiDjtM1hh7BhPKc/XPyySC13jU
         niXSyD92Rdd5O/abKhvyxcIMz7+ukEYeDESxPlgqrgF0lsnw9gGgs8D8sZ9QjkOadwMb
         wPNDFQNq8qe5dUXlcgXawuqSwZx/xeYXn8mHURFthUZpDlhYx//IGj70QTX7YHxAsywg
         flyDW/89NFdCa+0nnB87Yg/+uP7z4boOUVuGZ7ju9M8ueVdzAzdR2FReB+qLwB+IOJP5
         5HUqsTenE5s3+IR+Rt6UfTZEVSnvhMwcvfyHBiorwQjEX8CQGQ8+Rv+OijdGudfuykGR
         fKhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ1iCKtkPHixvmiL/CP9Yah82hOjyuUsK9+w1ueoLC0/x8BMi1T
	KkfkxsYTwgGMYnb1jHWDi7Jyl042Qj2bP9eYySp/ZsYJdh0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL+rDr71jbA/WlnPhEj+SZW3NNFr+Mkv2RyQJZBNwCZc9wEQP9i3nFtOHSM8+Z1AZyLfJoKlID1OvrlGvPXG1U=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8106:: with SMTP id c6mr2762587wmd.88.1588159908838;
 Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200428004737.19A4F9DB145@www.open-std.org> <AF9A8AE5-6590-429D-96EE-A2731DDD8CD3@arm.com>
 <20200428114456.5CCDA3568A1@www.open-std.org> <999548a1-9f82-418c-b8be-1fd87f94d3be@www.fastmail.com>
 <20200428172340.851A13568A1@www.open-std.org> <20200428195502.E072C3568BB@www.open-std.org>
 <5a392c04-ddab-46e6-8024-ae89b8658d29@www.fastmail.com> <20200428225409.F33B13587B3@www.open-std.org>
 <CALzYdaLuhYNaqrSgd5pGjXkCHF4-_AW4F6kPnwL8KEfA3E0iYg@mail.gmail.com> <20200429083749.4E7369DB117@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200429083749.4E7369DB117@www.open-std.org>
From: Milan Curcic <caomaco@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:31:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CALzYdaJogfTBqL7rG1VfD-iARmbDXf6RaSB6J2+SxE1vjCQ4mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [J3] (SC22WG5.6186) RE: [ukfortran] October meeting visa
 invitation letter
To: General J3 interest list <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>, Malcolm Cohen <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003682ea05a46c4be1"
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

--0000000000003682ea05a46c4be1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Malcolm,

> Well, **a** community is on GitHub. A substantial one even.



> > I'm afraid I don't think this sweeping generalisation is productive, or
fair.



> Neither is being told we=E2=80=99re not part of The community.

You're right. Being a native Slavic speaker, I misuse my articles often,
sometimes to disastrous effects. I apologize for minimizing other
communities. I didn't mean to do that.

GitHub is not a panacea and is not meant to replace live meetings, calls,
or even chat. I see it as "better email for developing software and
documents". It doesn't even mean to replace all email, but only some. So I
don't think doing everything on GitHub is the solution. However for what I
think is a significant fraction of committee work in the time between the
meetings, GitHub can provide powerful productivity tools.

Cheers,
Milan


On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 4:37 AM Malcolm Cohen via J3 <
j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:

> > The community is on GitHub.
>
>
>
> Well, **a** community is on GitHub. A substantial one even.
>
>
>
> > I'm afraid I don't think this sweeping generalisation is productive, or
> fair.
>
>
>
> Neither is being told we=E2=80=99re not part of The community.
>
>
>
> Now, I don=E2=80=99t think this was the intended meaning of the first pos=
ter, but
> it was a natural and obvious interpretation, so I understand Anton=E2=80=
=99s poor
> reaction. Of course the committee has already started to take this =E2=80=
=9CGitHub
> community=E2=80=9D seriously, and welcomed its input. That welcome is abs=
olutely *
> *not** being withdrawn.
>
>
>
> However, at this point I am not convinced that GitHub should become the
> central way that committee work should be done, and I agree with Bill tha=
t
> switching over to it right away seems more like a revolution than evoluti=
on.
>
>
>
> > works just fine with teams spread over many timezones
>
>
>
> Well, no. it does not work =E2=80=9Cjust fine=E2=80=9D for in-depth discu=
ssions the way we
> have traditionally done with subgroups. GitHub and all other technologica=
l
> solutions do not in fact solve the basic timezone issues that Bill pointe=
d
> out. Such technologies can certainly help, but they cannot do everything,
> and furthermore are not =E2=80=9Cneutral=E2=80=9D in their effect =E2=80=
=93 not everyone is
> comfortable **or effective** with them.
>
>
>
> Maybe in the end we will end up doing everything on GitHub, and maybe not=
.
> But for now, I would prefer that we =E2=80=9Chasten slowly=E2=80=9D.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
>
> ..............Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo.
>
>
>

--0000000000003682ea05a46c4be1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Malcolm,</div><div><br></div><p class=3D"MsoNormal">&=
gt; Well, *<b>a</b>* community is on GitHub. A substantial one even.<u></u>=
<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNo=
rmal">&gt; &gt; I&#39;m afraid I don&#39;t think this sweeping generalisati=
on is productive, or fair.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=
=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">&gt; Neither is being told we=E2=80=
=99re not part of The community.</p><div><br></div><div>You&#39;re right. B=
eing a native Slavic speaker, I misuse my articles often, sometimes to disa=
strous effects. I apologize for minimizing other communities. I didn&#39;t =
mean to do that.</div><div><br></div><div>GitHub is not a panacea and is no=
t meant to replace live meetings, calls, or even chat. I see=C2=A0it as &qu=
ot;better email for developing software and documents&quot;. It doesn&#39;t=
 even mean to replace all email, but only some. So I don&#39;t think doing =
everything on GitHub is the solution. However for what I think is a signifi=
cant fraction of committee work in the time between the meetings, GitHub ca=
n provide powerful productivity tools.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</di=
v><div>Milan</div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 4:37 AM =
Malcolm Cohen via J3 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org" targe=
t=3D"_blank">j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px sol=
id rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang=3D"EN-GB"><div><p class=3D"=
MsoNormal">&gt; The community is on GitHub.=C2=A0<u></u><u></u></p><p class=
=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Well, *<b>a</=
b>* community is on GitHub. A substantial one even.<u></u><u></u></p><p cla=
ss=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">&gt; I&#39;=
m afraid I don&#39;t think this sweeping generalisation is productive, or f=
air.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p cla=
ss=3D"MsoNormal">Neither is being told we=E2=80=99re not part of The commun=
ity.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p cla=
ss=3D"MsoNormal">Now, I don=E2=80=99t think this was the intended meaning o=
f the first poster, but it was a natural and obvious interpretation, so I u=
nderstand Anton=E2=80=99s poor reaction. Of course the committee has alread=
y started to take this =E2=80=9CGitHub community=E2=80=9D seriously, and we=
lcomed its input. That welcome is absolutely *<b>not</b>* being withdrawn.<=
u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D=
"MsoNormal">However, at this point I am not convinced that GitHub should be=
come the central way that committee work should be done, and I agree with B=
ill that switching over to it right away seems more like a revolution than =
evolution.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p>=
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">&gt; works just fine with teams spread over many tim=
ezones<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p c=
lass=3D"MsoNormal">Well, no. it does not work =E2=80=9Cjust fine=E2=80=9D f=
or in-depth discussions the way we have traditionally done with subgroups. =
GitHub and all other technological solutions do not in fact solve the basic=
 timezone issues that Bill pointed out. Such technologies can certainly hel=
p, but they cannot do everything, and furthermore are not =E2=80=9Cneutral=
=E2=80=9D in their effect =E2=80=93 not everyone is comfortable *<b>or effe=
ctive</b>* with them.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></u>=C2=A0=
<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Maybe in the end we will end up doing eve=
rything on GitHub, and maybe not. But for now, I would prefer that we =E2=
=80=9Chasten slowly=E2=80=9D.<u></u><u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u></=
u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Cheers,<u></u><u></u></p><div><p =
class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"text-align:justify"><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=
=3D"font-size:10.5pt">-- </span><span style=3D"font-size:10.5pt"><u></u><u>=
</u></span></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"text-align:justify"><span la=
ng=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.5pt">..............Malcolm Cohen, NAG Ox=
ford/Tokyo.</span><b><span lang=3D"EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p c=
lass=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"text-align:justify"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p></d=
iv></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>

--0000000000003682ea05a46c4be1--
