From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Apr 29 01:40:41 2020
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 240A09DB116; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 2559 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:40:40 CEST
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CF03587B3
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:40:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1])
	by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03SMeSfS007368
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:57:58 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=subject : from :
 reply-to : to : in-reply-to : references : content-type : date :
 message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=InSight1906;
 bh=cQ7G0I/MBErrbmRj0w9iyDzcEbwmrwQN6EvDEshLiWM=;
 b=TgF1Gm+OfZHS6Viu3KdO1qCa36cgQV5K6aYjOGnkJd8jfl20tkppwtce550sWxOX7wv8
 k8rSeKQSQlgPblQYE27xgjzCmJdZ7rgHeods0zckwDQsfyRvHPXeGFXFiUMjiAFrmcXZ
 TV1U7qJsD293w7cgeBEUmUXxrMruYghxJJuLmprFkIc44TmjEMI+8DxgWgVO0SPBR72K
 BauiHSBwEFk2u4FJITL0yj+/Q9y3KLUnXopS9FCzqZqhARuTVnGYDx7i+bgn54kKfesJ
 +7G2j6wqBNu9SpljlQiNYuRUHEikvQy/wP8e52h3EMOZYdYLt9qAuO9wqg/UgCFK34/u 5Q== 
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.53])
	by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 30pv8c0ay7-1
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:57:58 -0700
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 03SMvu69003116
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:57:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [J3] (SC22WG5.6176) [ukfortran] October meeting
 visa invitation letter
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <2FE166D3-C80C-49E7-8809-1E8C9471B6B8@cray.com>
References: <20200428004737.19A4F9DB145@www.open-std.org>
	 <AF9A8AE5-6590-429D-96EE-A2731DDD8CD3@arm.com>
	 <20200428114456.5CCDA3568A1@www.open-std.org>
	 <999548a1-9f82-418c-b8be-1fd87f94d3be@www.fastmail.com>
	 <20200428172340.851A13568A1@www.open-std.org>
	 <20200428195502.E072C3568BB@www.open-std.org>
	 <5a392c04-ddab-46e6-8024-ae89b8658d29@www.fastmail.com>
	 <2FE166D3-C80C-49E7-8809-1E8C9471B6B8@cray.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: Yes
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:57:56 -0700
Message-ID: <1588114676.1069.6.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-37.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Source-IP: math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]
X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676
 definitions=2020-04-28_15:2020-04-28,2020-04-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=765 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2004280176
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 22:46 +0000, Bill Long via J3 wrote:
> 
> > On Apr 28, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Ondřej Čertík via J3 <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> I'm very much against drastic changes.
> >> 
> >> Assuming we are talking about
> >> an evolution, not revolution,
> > 
> > Yes, evolution, not revolution.
> 
> Taking the paper discussion out of J3 and moving it to your githib
> site seems a lot like revolution. 
> 
> Anton’s point about time zones is well taken.  We had a lot of
> discussion about that when we were having similar planning sessions
> for the now-cancelled June meeting.  The time zone issue is even more
> dramatic for someone in Japan, which is effectively 12-hours, day /
> night reversed from the US.  I doubt if any of those of us in the US
> would have been happy about the idea of making the meeting in Tokyo
> on-line (during daytime hours there). 
> 
> Another topic that is quite relevant, that came up before, is that it
> is very hard for people to get away from their “day jobs” if they are
> at their home location.   This is an important reason the Las Vegas
> meetings are do effective. 

I agree with Bill, but, that said, there's no excuse not to do more work
by e-mail between meetings. The deal I made with my boss when I started
Fortran work in 1997 was about 10% of my yearly hours.  That's what
INCITS asked for.  That would be 220 hours.  Three meetings amounts to
120 hours.  I spend some work hours on Fortran e-mail, such as this one,
but typically not 100 hours per year. But I do spend a lot of time at
home, much more than 100 hours per year, instead of watching television
or going to movies.


