From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Mar  9 17:27:44 2020
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id D27069DB204; Mon,  9 Mar 2020 17:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 427 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 17:27:44 CET
Received: from fe3.lbl.gov (fe3.lbl.gov [131.243.228.52])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F039DB203
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  9 Mar 2020 17:27:44 +0100 (CET)
IronPort-SDR: 2lVHQDrr1UzcOtjI1R7RH1n0oMuCfG19O+wy/xK/WH+nJsdig9IUdeddESGiKvWo2k19Uqb9pf
 CdJhFjxDbw5A==
X-Ironport-SBRS: 2.7
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EHAgBqbGZef8WnVdFmHAEBAQEBBwE?=
 =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgXuBfYIfKoQVjwKCEZNhh10JAQEBAQEBAQEBNwQBAYRDAoIPJDg?=
 =?us-ascii?q?TAgMBAQsBAQYBAQEBAQUEAgIQAQEJCwsIJ4VrhjkBAQEDEhFFERALCw0CAiY?=
 =?us-ascii?q?CAiISAQUBHAYTCBqCRYM7BZwDgQQ9iyiBMoh2gT4SfCqMLBqBQT+BR4IwLj6?=
 =?us-ascii?q?HXIJeBJcTgROHbZARgkaWZhybNapgMoFGgXsrCAIYCCEPbAaCNVAYDZ0FJDC?=
 =?us-ascii?q?MSwSCPwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,533,1574150400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="189702910"
Received: from mail-oi1-f197.google.com ([209.85.167.197])
  by fe3.lbl.gov with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2020 09:20:32 -0700
Received: by mail-oi1-f197.google.com with SMTP id k22so5933939oic.5
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=0ZM2xYeMCk91YMQQfXw6iShN/9nIYngcWhly0FRfre0=;
        b=py5BC4W/tkqhbNWUf3hcCByL3VgWPxP39EBGV1yCmtkvJ9o3j2iK1JNeyZsBmI786S
         ZkMTIB5ZX10t6k5rr6GSjAPjJtZqDo71GeU9bsNVnVVzK/CUCtZO/ayWRSgp9CfR0/sq
         3wi9hXjMsj4hHs2IuhMFCOtuffoNPmQ8DVMO2+55FZRuOU0BrcnnbD6s04cW7jAtP9ME
         r+qur375MYztV7vVsDfqi8wwha6LnnDOLEeHxi34gwnBbMBePna4AJ8Zv86GA1J+G5Z9
         FIV3maQaQaSyPbAuTa+N6RJGHo1WpFgT3w2MdEODmN9xh0CNGo3cT7iQ5yuE9RVZxO0U
         UIdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3SCN+wHrMIbG7G30/E3FnMifXq0WqDRfVADRSPhDHZ2nRzkKqg
	x763ONCeCZBmAsxH43LQvvz9BiFpH6Kp9xnqbN4eLd8xtbCQ7zZO/sjN2cr79G6e3cvmG0/UVwO
	rjpnVTMq77BD/6Cx7t0revdukLRTRRoYKMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76d6:: with SMTP id p22mr13999905otl.37.1583770831541;
        Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuez4MQQurhyTt/fjGKbpOU4WgpoZ4so//WOo8mXaqHSiaRfwbnbB65d2J1LvC8Sgsx4D0CCIjLnJ8H7vlOjRI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76d6:: with SMTP id p22mr13999871otl.37.1583770831093;
 Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200309144853.0AD4F358750@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200309144853.0AD4F358750@www.open-std.org>
From: Brian Friesen <bfriesen@lbl.gov>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:20:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+KjR2YoKneYx2HOenJywTz5SEk7dokB31y_LPNU6AQsxkNEoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [J3] (SC22WG5.6151) Impact of coronavirus on WG5 meeting
To: General J3 interest list <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>, Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Steve,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:49 AM Steve Lionel via J3
<j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> I am sure that most of you are aware of increasing restrictions being
> placed on international (and domestic) travel by employers, and many
> planned in-person conferences and meetings have been canceled or made
> "virtual". Our next WG5 meeting is still a few months off, and the world
> situation may have changed by then, but people are making travel plans
> now and may need to get approval for travel, so I am wondering what WG5
> members want to do here.
>
> For those of you who had planned to attend the Minneapolis meeting, do
> you still currently plan to do so? I think ISO has something we could
> use for a virtual meeting, but our usual manner of working would be
> severely disrupted. Your thoughts and suggestions would be welcomed.

I still plan to attend WG5 in June. Berkeley has not (yet) curtailed
domestic travel.

Having visited the venue for this summer's WG5 a few times already, I
have found their A/V configuration to be straightforward to use. If
remote participants are able to configure Skype on their computers, I
imagine enabling remote participation for WG5 could still be a
productive (if not ideal) way to run the meeting, for both plenary and
subgroup.