From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Oct 24 19:30:05 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 754D79DB174; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:30:05 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com (mail-pf0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31C235695F for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b6so20171441pfh.7 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stevelionel.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y5MpvZ0KdRAprrRtBFn6Tbn1BPQJ9Do4qSPPXvynRAQ=; b=rH1LFx0mGZSrw8/rjm4vHM5gPEVjNcRBb8/IKjhi9y+3TqappC/q3pEOjSL667zCbZ islRghXP/SGWHYHBU1lvwIbXVSe280YSKXm79QuR3LZ7kwdfND4riZN0r8C8tEDVAqop +1nJYMO1oamo+FoHKciOXDJg8n13YnrllhMII= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y5MpvZ0KdRAprrRtBFn6Tbn1BPQJ9Do4qSPPXvynRAQ=; b=Bdu+Y+KSLVLVRlDoTrpPxobi7HEVeRwMyOYJ6zgbp/tk6hH4b96GIECKHQOOB2G0SM Ae0z7wYHKV4zRO9QxaP3idS4Y3sqJABMNibnOwe+bggI6OHwm//EW9/5hLDc/1sg9fO5 /POpvfip94gh8q5Q6JeUiCpTgh36d/TGgrD60zAUWEKloq0b5kPMvsIsAaRcCz2q1wD6 XCFIicMGTlJnPWTrZdsSa7IVY0z4SKTg0F2YRl6o2MaDB8w90fvA3fimHrXyrhGC1NSj 2+xFsxxpuGY859qTvTvGMDUsQmd4BNw3J63eo+/u8r+6XCyngF7gP2cT4ZZvxo6Gf+6w kyfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVA9bKqmV3h0xDm82nO5LgNQIzsfiOw4qSCQi3C3nypPt/llx5v E2sH5A9smUwin+F4uTX4AyI/mLgG9Mnev91cnYMJ7s8KycM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SOezONKreYJDduHg+cgiCwOocQW2md4D999EJtQxpnv7tl4YSqxB6r/LFe3YxnCFtNNeC3bhXqBF9pXIVW/3I= X-Received: by 10.101.92.135 with SMTP id a7mr15493578pgt.263.1508866202588; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.137.170 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.168.105.188] From: Steve Lionel Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Let's start over on the straw ballot To: WG5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0826695804f2b9055c4e4a92" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --089e0826695804f2b9055c4e4a92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Several people now have told me that they are unable to use the ISO eBallot application. I since also learned that using this application would exclude some people whose opinion is valued. This is a learning process for me. So forget the ISO web site - we'll do this in email. Please reply* directly to me* (verify the return address when you click Reply) with your opinion on the following questions - answer each one with Yes/No/Abstain, and add comments if you wish. For the two of you who managed to register a vote, please vote again through this email. I will close this poll November 10, 2017 at 12:01AM UTC. My apologies for the thrash and problems. Steve Do you approve making the technical change to add a requirement that the variable specified for STAT= in MOVE_ALLOC and the ATOMIC_xxx intrinsics have a minimum decimal range of 4? See J3 paper 17-219 for details. Yes/No/Abstain Do you approve disallowing a coarray or coindexed variable on the left side of an intrinsic assignment statement if it is an unallocated allocatable variable? This is an incompatibility with Fortran 2008 which did not disallow this. See J3 paper 17-228 for details. Yes/No/Abstain Do you approve making the technical change to disallow coarrays of TEAM_TYPE? See J3 papers 17-202r1 and 17-250r2 for details. Yes/No/Abstain Do you approve, after making changes passed at J3 meeting 214, creating a Draft International Standard (DIS) and sending it for ballot? This would meet the current development schedule. Yes/No/Abstain Do you approve changing the informal name of the in-development Fortran standard from "Fortran 2015" to "Fortran 2018"? See J3 paper 17-193r1 for details. Yes/No/Abstain -- . --089e0826695804f2b9055c4e4a92 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Several people now have told me that they are unable to us= e the ISO eBallot application. I since also learned that using this applica= tion would exclude some people whose opinion is valued. This is a learning = process for me.

So forget the ISO web site - we'= ;ll do this in email. Please reply directly to me=C2=A0(verify the r= eturn address when you click Reply) with your opinion on the following ques= tions - answer each one with Yes/No/Abstain, and add comments if you wish. = For the two of you who managed to register a vote, please vote again throug= h this email. I will close this poll November 10, 2017 at 12:01AM UTC.

My apologies for the thrash and problems.
Steve


Do you= approve making the technical change to add a requirement that the variable= specified for STAT=3D in MOVE_ALLOC and the ATOMIC_xxx intrinsics have a m= inimum decimal range of 4? See J3 paper 17-219 for details. Yes/No/Abstain

Do you appr= ove disallowing a coarray or coindexed variable on the left side of an intr= insic assignment statement if it is an unallocated allocatable variable? Th= is is an incompatibility with Fortran 2008 which did not disallow this. See= J3 paper 17-228 for details. Yes/No= /Abstain

Do you approve making the technical chang= e to disallow coarrays of TEAM_TYPE? See J3 papers 17-202r1 and 17-250r2 fo= r details. Yes/No/Abstain
=
Do you approve, after making changes passed at J3 meeting 21= 4, creating a Draft International Standard (DIS) and sending it for ballot?= This would meet the current development schedule. Yes/No/Abstain

Do you approve chang= ing the informal name of the in-development Fortran standard from "For= tran 2015" to "Fortran 2018"? See J3 paper 17-193r1 for deta= ils. Yes/No/Abstain
--
--089e0826695804f2b9055c4e4a92--