From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Oct  9 21:02:10 2017
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 3D4DE358A11; Mon,  9 Oct 2017 21:02:10 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com (mail-qt0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF396357222
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  9 Oct 2017 21:02:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q4so45042748qtq.8
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=stevelionel.com; s=google;
        h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language;
        bh=xMadgeekzMap1FXW5GzQqjEZ0Zl9ywUIGrjbWi3vNRQ=;
        b=vp+2OCspYVKgnhZEip8cWzBEjSx4f6Wsb2ESGsp9cdLFafFASFOg/8hAl+YtOm+E9W
         BOOUqMKyjTE2p/UfhpAP5FcE1qikuYv38XfU6zOVyehucXtn0qegGesxDIMfVj5b8wt2
         OAnEeiI6sO3sB6l+Kdn7w1of5ozgBDa7G4/F8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-language;
        bh=xMadgeekzMap1FXW5GzQqjEZ0Zl9ywUIGrjbWi3vNRQ=;
        b=BDMqTq5SUXNLnxAKT55iqgjrf/sbfxgxJiLkk3ujolFqu+SkjWhN16OYRxHWJpnwCw
         HQ8Nc2Gl1j2CM/6fuewR7LHFH4WseVVQPVodQpWzUlLQTXCpVAoM335pelcePHo3e3uq
         AkVlmEkfBXkiDi3v5ua0TNIEAWRRCCvl5k6WVRxQtw2WKbFzSbGH5kyu3kgPr6bltGO/
         U1iPH+ESsOyhbQxhObYt50DVpL8mNOSpLSnq2TpaBIBsuW6/eDs7sbKi/QlaGzDaL+qa
         avIWJBbpKF4fkTXHB2iClBZNcG4tntl5NjbZCLigBMeU86KEoFZykYKlUx7+Jp/hjmwi
         2q2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX2oUbQ3LczTeNgeb59bEx/cSs0SM7Q6aU6B1+TFxlyXuJYtUMl
	+DS9BJIXdYHnFC06sBvyVF/OLO/gSTA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDUoGDdWULA8TlAFP/TqFBBxTjjITkoD1dz+yJRTj6RCTfGXUbxpuTyPITeT7TRo9SIpSb0VQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.34.67 with SMTP id p3mr8755099qtp.218.1507575728158;
        Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.137] (pool-71-168-105-188.cncdnh.fast11.myfairpoint.net. [71.168.105.188])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm5318432qth.53.2017.10.09.12.02.05
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5983) [Fwd: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22/WG 5 New
 documents available on ISOTC eCommittee]
To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20171009185141.7A0A33585C0@www.open-std.org>
From: Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead:  GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <02e43e14-7d40-036a-d269-a79c8c2d862b@stevelionel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:02:00 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171009185141.7A0A33585C0@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/9/2017 2:51 PM, Van Snyder wrote
> A few comments on the comments:
>
> There's a lot of hidden duplication.
>
> There are many requests for things we've been asked to do many times
> before, such as short-circuit logical operators, default initial values
> for absent arguments, automatic initialization without SAVE, first-class
> enumeration types....
I did not attempt to correlate and order the comments - I just included 
them raw. Yes, there are some duplicate requests, and yes, there are 
requests for things we've looked at before. There's even a request for a 
feature already in F2003 (I had meant to remove that but didn't.)

The purpose of this was to include the user community in the planning 
process from the start, as we discussed in Garching. I think the biggest 
benefit is seeing the response to generics, but I think it also helps us 
with prioritization of some smaller items. In addition, I think it helps 
connect us to the Fortran community (and vice-versa.) For a lot of 
Fortran users, the committee is a faceless black-box - I hoped to change 
that.

I will admit that I was startled by the comment "I hope that features 
aren't added for the express purpose of driving out free compilers from 
the market." - no clue where THAT came from....

Steve
