From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Sep 26 20:43:42 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 43BD03587F5; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (smtp.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC867357250 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:43:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id v8QIhYtN009405 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:43:36 -0700 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5954) generic programming in F2020 From: Van Snyder Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov To: sc22wg5 In-Reply-To: <20170926174021.A8F283587DC@www.open-std.org> References: <20170926174021.A8F283587DC@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Organization: Yes Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:43:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1506451414.32527.103.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-37.el6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 17:40 +0000, Bader, Reinhold wrote: > Dear WG5, > > attached please find a draft with my musings on what generic > programming features in F2020 might look like. Reinhold: Take a look at J3 paper 04-383r1, which described my proposal for parameterized modules. No other significant project (impact on std > 3) had a higher "hate dislike like love" score in 04-423r1.xls (UK proposals weren't scored). The only significant project that had a higher "ABC" priority was coarrays. 04-383r1 was de-scoped at the Delft meeting in 2005, as described in 05-195. I prefer 04-383r1. I also prefer parameterized modules to macros. Macros can be gotten from cpp or m4 or .... Aleks Donev wrote 04-247 on a similar topic. Van > Regards > Reinhold > > _______________________________________________ > J3 mailing list > J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3