From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Aug 22 17:29:20 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id A3BFF35892A; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:29:20 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from smtp-out-5.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-5.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E2035706B for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:29:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([88.104.17.47]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id kB7FdVxuWmUZCkB7FdrhB8; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:29:17 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [88.104.17.47] Subject: Re: AW: (SC22WG5.5942) (j3.2006) draft comments for CD To: "Bader, Reinhold" , WG5 References: <20170815095717.F1BA33587E3@www.open-std.org> <20170821221452.111BB3587E3@www.open-std.org> <7b1d382b512a4333b6edee618180dc20@lrz.de> From: John Reid Message-ID: <14404f3f-49c4-9cf6-f195-e59069518390@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:29:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7b1d382b512a4333b6edee618180dc20@lrz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAXiMWEgj65aqrpXoISxzi9l69CDEgR26YVp2qn9yFzd5yS9xzn0JrPDw6jNqmcldm8z5082Q+r8yKSjAS/1vEp1XsUvKXtpBOxEDLRTRv4uxXFUAZhw rISDD1Gnhfaf6LavnsPH6wbmIX/Y7w+BtJpnb3pCsnwFQTThm2TVkBHLsPdX6Jwvhc5iwV9b8HqmiHc8EqefwLJ+KN9eXrzrO4iUYR5zYQAFUnW2V1O3DfVy Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Reinhold, Bader, Reinhold wrote: > Hello John, > > thanks for the feedback. Further comments inline. Thanks for telling me how you have treated my comments. 187:26. I don't think this edit is needed. An associated coarray is established by the association, see 5.4.8, para 3. Re 562:32, I agree that a change at 187:26 is desirable, but it should be a separate comment in order with the others. The TS (at 10: 23-24) says "The coarray shall be established when the CHANGE TEAM statement begins execution." but this seems not to have made it to the draft standard. How about using these words? I think an edit might be needed to the example on 562. Cheers, John > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org] >> Im Auftrag von John Reid >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. August 2017 00:15 >> An: WG5 >> Betreff: (SC22WG5.5942) (j3.2006) draft comments for CD >> >> >> >> Bader, Reinhold wrote: >>> Dear WG5/J3, >>> >>> >>> >>> attached please find my draft contribution for the comments from >> Germany. >> >> Here are my (personal) comments on your comments. >> >> 40:17. I think the present text is OK. An image can have an execution state of >> failed. > > OK - I've deleted this comment. >> >> 45:22. An image can be a member of more than one established team, so the >> new words would be better as “of a team in which it is established (5.4.8)”. > I've made this change. > >> >> 105:29-30. I think the present text is OK. An assumed-rank entity is just that. >> It is not an array. > > Unfortunately, the object has the DIMENSION attribute, and an assumed-rank-spec is > a variant of array-spec. I've modified the suggested change to read: > > [105:29-30] Delete C831 > [104:14+] Insert reworded constraint C829+ > “A named object with the DIMENSION attribute that has the POINTER or ALLOCATABLE attribute shall have an array-spec that is a deferred-shape-spec-list or an assumed-rank-spec.” > >> >> 124. For the edit, don't you need "of a derived type defined in the module"? > Yes,done. >> >> 188. I think the definitive text needs to be clearer on this point. > > Maybe, but Bill hasn't commented on the relevant thread yet, so this might become homework for J3. > >> >> 500:22-23. In the edit, change "subscripts[n-1]" to "subscript[n-1]". > > The parameter has the name "subscripts", so I think my edit is OK. > > Cheers > Reinhold > >> >> 562:32. Comment to come. >> >> Cheers, >> >> John.