From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Aug 22 00:14:51 2017
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id C032A3587D1; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:14:51 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from smtp-out-3.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-3.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.131])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75935877F
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:14:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([88.104.17.47])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id juy9dHZIzY86vjuy9dfuwO; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:14:49 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [88.104.17.47]
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5933) draft comments for CD
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20170815095717.F1BA33587E3@www.open-std.org>
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <432ad262-37dd-1d82-097a-0cb2e0d57160@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:14:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170815095717.F1BA33587E3@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOiIO9aC1FSr0nxXD4ZJPFdBbI1Hd/cSzBqAMBgmEsPBBwINsODmjnEZC9jFLV18b8t7MSiHTGerJwiFs2xCVopDfPNNjIf4N9ojX+ffx1GYog9eEIxo
 CdMhKkFhCjgMwuea+AxS1ul67LJoI5ptiXNLqapyfU2+lNG8aSUGepQTE0l3zUTF+JdstisQC1jqV6gb/zvwjsFdCh7Qt3watBQ=
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk



Bader, Reinhold wrote:
> Dear WG5/J3,
>
>
>
> attached please find my draft contribution for the comments from Germany.

Here are my (personal) comments on your comments.

40:17. I think the present text is OK. An image can have an execution 
state of failed.

45:22. An image can be a member of more than one established team, so 
the new words would be better as “of a team in which it is established 
(5.4.8)”.

105:29-30. I think the present text is OK. An assumed-rank entity is 
just that. It is not an array.

124. For the edit, don't you need "of a derived type defined in the 
module"?

188. I think the definitive text needs to be clearer on this point.

500:22-23. In the edit, change "subscripts[n-1]" to "subscript[n-1]".

562:32. Comment to come.

Cheers,

John.