From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Jul 12 17:24:28 2017
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 2D03F3587DE; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:24:28 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FD23569AE
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x187so22377398oig.3
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=stevelionel.com; s=google;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=quHseMKo1/PbcoD+jdtIDeimgJz2M4ixuSGcG+otduk=;
        b=OjBBIB2N8hLQxsr9m74oesfrB6juOAQt+iOzggji+olUf21ndfoIGfAVc1YalEQ19C
         fp4Jnn9Gom9ENNGLO9fQaaI7i9bAPOg919hDYrRlTPFQC80HtlDgYV0NkDfbg02SOwRj
         kmmLKRp73kWdZ03jrDJvTI5U6tW9MEpTsqZzM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=quHseMKo1/PbcoD+jdtIDeimgJz2M4ixuSGcG+otduk=;
        b=SfEQ0EHN6grbAppQ5OBEE9kw8MpmSmIfoD2M+nfdggKmuUMs0KCOHpwtex38qoGDr0
         nbzxIMQ/YqH3dr/CM5lDXfFIRNRW236u2biCpFdd+IcdXZN/W7Eq9rQ7aapg8/M+jMPa
         TjCFyLFo9I31OBBPiA0cdZ/FPRRUkklG2ZqEx+vpoyWcsUTYyp3iuOoppbf2eCfr4eWB
         eldHbVgUdqtpTO1Z1efKwsHJaGbSNsDyoqZJRCtfuKliXzSCZiNHaF+49itzJi9tQy2R
         m9+JIXkL0A/M4vkySetuipTgfhbPM9aQv1n0y+5kHQmK+IBxHp55Hvz5SJwklxkJFXpQ
         irXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113OoN8AhGOb2odsCBcc4i1xeycAeGhKzYGQtJH/m5ZC1jQy4ilm
	QJ+vrTJtreNWJ7vEtKLBQbdLu4bJvTvScVs=
X-Received: by 10.202.221.87 with SMTP id u84mr4290236oig.64.1499873066005;
 Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.113.137 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.168.105.188]
In-Reply-To: <20170712151445.1B9143587DB@www.open-std.org>
References: <20170702233407.599BA35828D@www.open-std.org> <20170712091922.F336E3587DA@www.open-std.org>
 <20170712151445.1B9143587DB@www.open-std.org>
From: Steve Lionel <steve@stevelionel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:24:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEH1ojPoeVqUVqof=SexpNC3x1V0fGScLF7JR9WXy8qzYv3ojw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5916) [ukfortran] Preview of possible feature survey
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Cc: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d526c4ed47405542069a4"
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

--001a113d526c4ed47405542069a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Do we have such lists already? I didn't think so, unless you meant the ones
for F2015. I don't think it's helpful to make the list too large,
especially if we're going to stick with ranked-choice voting (which I think
gives us more information and also prompts the user to think about their
priorities.)

The NBs can and will make their lists anyway. The idea here is to see what
users want that we may not have thought of.

Steve

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:14 AM, N.M. Maclaren <nmm1@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> I agree with John that more open-endedness is desirable. But I also think
> that it should include all of the features suggested by National Bodies but
> not included in the draft standard. Probably in generalised or grouped
> forms.
>
> Regards,
> Nick.
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>



-- 
.

--001a113d526c4ed47405542069a4
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Do we have such lists already? I didn&#39;t think so, unle=
ss you meant the ones for F2015. I don&#39;t think it&#39;s helpful to make=
 the list too large, especially if we&#39;re going to stick with ranked-cho=
ice voting (which I think gives us more information and also prompts the us=
er to think about their priorities.)<div><br></div><div>The NBs can and wil=
l make their lists anyway. The idea here is to see what users want that we =
may not have thought of.</div><div><br></div><div>Steve</div></div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1=
1:14 AM, N.M. Maclaren <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:nmm1@cam.ac.=
uk" target=3D"_blank">nmm1@cam.ac.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex">I agree with John that more open-endedness is desirable. =
But I also think<br>
that it should include all of the features suggested by National Bodies but=
<br>
not included in the draft standard. Probably in generalised or grouped<br>
forms.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Nick.<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
J3 mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org">J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org</a><=
br>
<a href=3D"http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3" rel=3D"norefe=
rrer" target=3D"_blank">http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo=
/j3</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=
=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><a=
>.</a></div></div>
</div>

--001a113d526c4ed47405542069a4--