From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Jul 12 17:14:45 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id BC0783587D7; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F39E3569AE for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:14:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:42130) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1dVJLe-000ISo-jy (Exim 4.89) (return-path ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:14:42 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1dVJLe-0004yK-7q (Exim 4.89) (return-path ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:14:42 +0100 Received: from [146.199.130.7] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 12 Jul 2017 16:14:42 +0100 Date: 12 Jul 2017 16:14:42 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: John Reid Cc: WG5 List Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5914) Preview of possible feature survey Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170712091922.F336E3587DA@www.open-std.org> References: <20170702233407.599BA35828D@www.open-std.org> <20170712091922.F336E3587DA@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk I agree with John that more open-endedness is desirable. But I also think that it should include all of the features suggested by National Bodies but not included in the draft standard. Probably in generalised or grouped forms. Regards, Nick.