From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed May 10 22:52:08 2017
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 72E6B358920; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:52:08 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from rgout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout0403.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.216])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A79E358745
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.152.129.144 (GB)
X-OWM-Env-Sender: d.t.muxworthy@btinternet.com
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.5.10.203316:17:8.317,ip=,rules=__HAS_FROM,
 __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ,
 __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __REFERENCES, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME,
 __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MSGID_APPLEMAIL, __MIME_VERSION, __HAS_X_MAILER,
 __X_MAILER_APPLEMAIL, MIME_LOWER_CASE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW,
 __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW,
 BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_P1,
 __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS,
 __USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __MIME_TEXT_P,
 REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
Received: from davids-imac.home (81.152.129.144) by rgout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as d.t.muxworthy@btinternet.com)
        id 58482DA21069603A for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 21:52:04 +0100
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re:  WG5 Convenorship
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:52:01 +0100
References: <F0B3AE96BB2F1F48BDCA64175E85625C3CEE06@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Message-Id: <F167B085-E936-41A8-B28B-73F63F868FAD@bcs.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Forwarded on behalf of Jon Steidel, who was not on the sc22wg5 whitelist =
(but is now).


> Begin forwarded message:
>=20
> From: "Steidel, Jon L" <jon.l.steidel@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) WG5 Convenorship
> Date: 10 May 2017 at 20:09:23 BST
> To: fortran standards email list for J3 <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>, =
WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>=20
> Hi  Steve,
>=20
> You will have to bribe someone other than Lorri to get the minutes out =
quickly as she is not planning to attend the Garching meeting.  I am not =
sure who the acting secretary will be.  My guess is that Lorri worked =
that out with Dan?
>=20
> -jon
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org =
[mailto:j3-bounces@mailman.j3-
>> fortran.org] On Behalf Of Steve Lionel
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 1:42 PM
>> To: j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org; WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
>> Subject: Re: (j3.2006) WG5 Convenorship
>>=20
>> (I'm sending this to both lists as I am not certain my emails to WG5 =
get
>> forwarded to J3. If you get this twice, my apologies.)
>>=20
>> Ah, those pesky technical details...
>>=20
>> I am now an alternate to Kernelyze, whose principal is Tom Knox. Tom =
joined
>> J3 and attended his first meeting last October. Neither Tom nor I =
attended
>> the February meeting, and INCITS rules require that a new member is
>> "provisional" until they have attended two meetings. Only full =
members can
>> volunteer for the convenor position. INCITS set the deadline for =
applications
>> as June 5, but the next meeting isn't until June 26.
>>=20
>> No problem! We'll just hold an impromptu telephone meeting in =
advance,
>> which Tom can attend, and then we'll be all set. Right? Um, not so =
fast...
>> INCITS rules require four week advance notice for such meetings.
>> As of June 1, that changes to two weeks, but neither one helps. So =
that idea
>> is right out.
>>=20
>> Jennifer Garner of INCITS tells me that if nobody from J3 (PL22.3 in
>> INCITS-speak) volunteers by June 5, she'll put out a second call with =
a due
>> date of sometime in July. Simply attending a meeting isn't sufficient =
- INCITS
>> has to receive and process the minutes of the meeting, listing =
attendees,
>> before the status can change.
>>=20
>> The plan now is to let the first call expire, we'll hold the regular =
meeting in
>> Garching (Tom and I will both be there), and then I'll =
encourage/bribe Lorri
>> to be prompt at sending in the minutes sufficiently in advance of the =
second
>> call deadline to get the status changed. Then and only then am I =
allowed to
>> volunteer!
>>=20
>> Isn't this fun?
>>=20
>> Steve

