From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Apr 13 11:45:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 57C53358855; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from smtp-out-5.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-5.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F8A356DDA for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([212.139.93.115]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id ybJdcdYgNeHonybJdcw9u4; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:45:25 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [212.139.93.115] Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5850) CD comments process To: sc22wg5@open-std.org References: <20170412161335.6251A3586EA@www.open-std.org> <20170412172308.6731A3586EA@www.open-std.org> From: John Reid Message-ID: <2db42692-9be9-a152-7f07-49c2c1348f5a@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:45:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170412172308.6731A3586EA@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMkOcmqfDStxE+GuRTFkEqZ2te/DBLIjU5jO7gAKXYeEIa3SJ6Xn/yIiQAF2RodW2shtBuqO0xxB6ESRp6GSLyooiDatjuiKrgUpz5j/Bv5MbHddGKWx KRqS8YO9W0UI7akQfejn9WCusRQUeY4zy2XMgAdNuPgPEyevnTpwPPMiQF6E7ez0ae0xl8a890Pg6PBOdF4fok8zeyP69/9xdfU= Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Anton, David does not mention that J3 is presently forming the US position. Whatever they choose will be in front of WG5 together with votes from other countries, including the UK. And, yes, I expect J3 to consider its meeting papers in the usual way. John. David Muxworthy wrote: > On 12 Apr 2017, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> I'm confused about the CD comments process. >> Should the UK position on CD take into account >> the papers submitted for J3 213 meeting in Garching? >> I understood that after CD is issued, the >> national bodies vote on CD. So will the papers >> submitted for J3 213 be discussed after the >> CD has been approved, and all national bodies >> comments, if any, have been applied? > > In the SC22 ballot countries (SC22 member bodies - 20 participating > and 24 observing) are voting on the CD as issued, i.e. SC22 N5191 aka > 17-007r1. What has been already submitted for Garching is irrelevant. > The SC22 Secretariat will collate the countries' comments and forward > them to WG5 for processing. WG5 has to respond formally to the ballot > comments (accept or reject) as well as considering those proposals > sent directly to J3. > > In practice most countries not actively participating in WG5 will vote > 'yes without comment' or abstain but there is sometimes input from > interested people who cannot attend WG5 for financial reasons. > > Thus the CD is not yet cast in stone. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > J3 mailing list > J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3 >