From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Apr 12 19:23:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5178635892A; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:23:08 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 381 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:23:07 CEST Received: from rgout0705.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout0705.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.145]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E52C356E38 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:23:04 +0200 (CEST) X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.185.166.124 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: d.t.muxworthy@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=10/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.4.12.170915:17:10.669,ip=,rules=__CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __MIME_VERSION, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_FROM, __IN_REP_TO, __CTE, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MSGID_APPLEMAIL, __REFERENCES, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __HAS_X_MAILER, __X_MAILER_APPLEMAIL, RCVD_FROM_IP_DATE, __TO_IN_SUBJECT2, MIME_LOWER_CASE, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODY_SIZE_1100_1199, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL, IN_REP_TO, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, NO_URI_FOUND, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, TO_IN_SUBJECT, __MIME_TEXT_P, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS Received: from davids-imac.home (86.185.166.124) by rgout07.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as d.t.muxworthy@btinternet.com) id 58BFF27E03DE0106 for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:16:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5849) CD comments process From: David Muxworthy In-Reply-To: <20170412161335.6251A3586EA@www.open-std.org> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:16:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <94042C53-56FF-4742-9106-A141AF7CC49E@bcs.org.uk> References: <20170412161335.6251A3586EA@www.open-std.org> To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 12 Apr 2017, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm confused about the CD comments process. > Should the UK position on CD take into account > the papers submitted for J3 213 meeting in Garching? > I understood that after CD is issued, the > national bodies vote on CD. So will the papers > submitted for J3 213 be discussed after the > CD has been approved, and all national bodies > comments, if any, have been applied? In the SC22 ballot countries (SC22 member bodies - 20 participating and 24 observing) are voting on the CD as issued, i.e. SC22 N5191 aka 17-007r1. What has been already submitted for Garching is irrelevant. The SC22 Secretariat will collate the countries' comments and forward them to WG5 for processing. WG5 has to respond formally to the ballot comments (accept or reject) as well as considering those proposals sent directly to J3. In practice most countries not actively participating in WG5 will vote 'yes without comment' or abstain but there is sometimes input from interested people who cannot attend WG5 for financial reasons. Thus the CD is not yet cast in stone. David