From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Feb 20 11:55:30 2017
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 53A1B3587D7; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:30 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 488 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:22 CET
Received: from smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.130])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063C6356888
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([212.139.93.115])
	by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP
	id flUtcJFZxTrRiflUtcJBkg; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:47:11 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [212.139.93.115]
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Subject: Preparing for the CD ballot
Message-ID: <1b7e2e8e-e7d2-7522-3186-9566874591f4@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:47:09 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJUARQUeOAiI7Gm+IIlm/uAxmRuXFP6NrC/HVE/bEPM8ZhasAQz+SGVPMEuMAO3EL9G762cFbDUfpclYLLjMfAhZMzcS2Uu6k6Bkts0qJKs13oaTctxx
 rvDlGg/5ZJ9n0Qd0T062P9F899JBt4qaAx9F6s1yq+9R+yscwKDzaSHoMeucy7GUNg/0ioOri3cCGldPbRfcWOA5KsKu7BHH1R4=
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear all,

J3 had a successful meeting last week and agreed some edits for the 
draft of the new standard, but significantly less than last time.  Two 
were very minor technical changes (see 17-123r2 and 17-125r3). The rest 
were editorial. We are definitely converging. Our plans say (N2106)

    CD determined                  2017-02    J3
    CD ballot initiated            2017-03
    CD ballot comments available   2017-05

Malcolm says that he is confident of meeting an end-of-February deadline 
for the new draft. I propose that when this is available, a small 
subgroup checks the changes before it is sent to SC22 for CD ballot. Is 
this OK with everyone? For members of the subgroup, I suggest Dan, Bill, 
and myself. Dan and Bill, is this OK with you? Does anyone else want to 
be involved?

I am anxious that the CD ballot comments be available well before the 
June meeting in Garching so that we can be well prepared to address the 
comments then.

Best wishes,

John.