From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Feb 20 11:55:30 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 53A1B3587D7; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:30 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 488 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:22 CET Received: from smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063C6356888 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([212.139.93.115]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id flUtcJFZxTrRiflUtcJBkg; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:47:11 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [212.139.93.115] To: WG5 From: John Reid Subject: Preparing for the CD ballot Message-ID: <1b7e2e8e-e7d2-7522-3186-9566874591f4@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:47:09 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJUARQUeOAiI7Gm+IIlm/uAxmRuXFP6NrC/HVE/bEPM8ZhasAQz+SGVPMEuMAO3EL9G762cFbDUfpclYLLjMfAhZMzcS2Uu6k6Bkts0qJKs13oaTctxx rvDlGg/5ZJ9n0Qd0T062P9F899JBt4qaAx9F6s1yq+9R+yscwKDzaSHoMeucy7GUNg/0ioOri3cCGldPbRfcWOA5KsKu7BHH1R4= Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Dear all, J3 had a successful meeting last week and agreed some edits for the draft of the new standard, but significantly less than last time. Two were very minor technical changes (see 17-123r2 and 17-125r3). The rest were editorial. We are definitely converging. Our plans say (N2106) CD determined 2017-02 J3 CD ballot initiated 2017-03 CD ballot comments available 2017-05 Malcolm says that he is confident of meeting an end-of-February deadline for the new draft. I propose that when this is available, a small subgroup checks the changes before it is sent to SC22 for CD ballot. Is this OK with everyone? For members of the subgroup, I suggest Dan, Bill, and myself. Dan and Bill, is this OK with you? Does anyone else want to be involved? I am anxious that the CD ballot comments be available well before the June meeting in Garching so that we can be well prepared to address the comments then. Best wishes, John.