From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Dec 5 10:44:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 45A52358761; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:44:03 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-2.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179713566A8 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:43:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([212.139.77.201]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id DpoUcGOisTrRiDpoUcCvZr; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:43:58 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [212.139.77.201] Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5820) [ukfortran] Result of straw ballot To: WG5 References: <20161203145421.0109935872B@www.open-std.org> <20161205005951.30C88356AD6@www.open-std.org> From: John Reid Message-ID: <584536DC.6050405@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:43:56 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161205005951.30C88356AD6@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDqOOHhmRzUeRTAOGvoAkhackUh9rg/5wpWigafiawFBlDpP8odUYXTrJQms58OCaiEx2RoR/0OljZZKp/J6+2B4NZWnDPjEanG3BwP5svwrGJepR3Ew XMxR/oiwcePDwr991/NTpKYOgXTwJlDnV3HDKDVmNjvl5A/G2brwXueQOSrQRo5ScVIG1Kub1po6KJZHA90dMYyAmJluDLR369w= Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Cohen Malcolm wrote: > This is a vote whether to put something in the standard, or not. Well, all four clearly passed, so you have authority to put them all in the draft standard. I was expecting that the comments would be considered at the Feb. J3 meeting. How's this more precise wording? C vote passes, subject to J3 considering the comments during future editorial processing Cheers, John. > > The votes must either PASS or FAIL. I object in the strongest possible > terms to the nonsense that "It passes subject to something happening in the > future." > > If a vote does not PASS the editor will not put the feature into the > standard, and given the timing that really rules it out of consideration > until the 2020 revision. > > Cheers, > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Reid > Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 11:54 PM > To: WG5 > Subject: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5819) Result of straw ballot > > Dear all, > > Here is the tentative result of the ballot on four small technical > changes. Please let me know by Dec 8 if I have missed a ballot or made > any other error. > > Best wishes, > > John. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ukfortran mailing list > https://lists.accu.org/mailman/listinfo/ukfortran > >