From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Nov 11 11:07:48 2016
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 5FE6335877E; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:07:48 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA37356A24
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:07:44 +0100 (CET)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:38995)
	by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1c58kJ-0010Le-fp (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:07:43 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1c58kJ-0007ly-UY (Exim 4.72)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:07:43 +0000
Received: from [87.113.54.140] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 11 Nov 2016 10:07:43 +0000
Date: 11 Nov 2016 10:07:43 +0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5809) Straw ballot on four small technical
 changes
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1611111007430.25807@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20161111093428.CD23D35877E@www.open-std.org>
References: <20161111093428.CD23D35877E@www.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Thank you. I do not know why I had never learnt that :-( I have certainly 
never seen warnings about the resulting gotchas. I will change my vote 
again.

Regards,
Nick.