From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Nov 10 21:27:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 9C425358887; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:27:59 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCD13568B7 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:27:52 +0100 (CET) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:56014) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1c4vws-0003o4-QZ (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:27:50 +0000 Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1c4vws-0004WY-6G (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:27:50 +0000 Received: from [146.200.136.56] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 10 Nov 2016 20:27:50 +0000 Date: 10 Nov 2016 20:27:50 +0000 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: Cohen Malcolm Cc: WG5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5805) AW: Straw ballot on four small technicalchanges Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20161031003534.5CD803588DD@www.open-std.org> References: <20161028134238.1EADD3582C8@www.open-std.org> <20092fa9b8394506b9d711907d120b70@BADWLRZ-SWMBX04.ads.mwn.de> <20161028154343.BC7A03582C8@www.open-std.org> <20161031003534.5CD803588DD@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk >The primary mistake is thinking that we are voting on the edits to the >draft. We are not. You are correct. I am not in great shape, and had missed that. I should like to change my vote to: Yes No Paper Subject --- -N- 06-277r1 Allow C_SIZEOF for an assumed-rank array -Y- --- 06-280r2 Allow cross-image access to violate aliasing rules for coarray dummies --- --- 06-285r2 Clarify ordering of finalisation w.r.t. deallocation in assignment(*) -Y- --- 06-289 Additional prohibitions on pure procedures(*) 06-277r1 Because assumed-size arrays can be converted to assumed-rank objects, this change permits a usage that has no defined behaviour, and where there are several possibilities compatible with the rest of the standard. C_SIZEOF (18.2.3.7 486:24) forbids assumed-size arrays and, in lines 29-31 defines the result in terms of the element size and number of elements (which is unspecified for assumed-size arrays). Note that I am not voting against the change in principle, but against the lack of an explicit specification for this case. 06-285r2 I am abstaining deliberately, because I cannot work out whether the change clarifies the situation or not. Regards, Nick.