From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat Oct 8 02:23:45 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 7BF37358484; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 02:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 02:23:44 CEST Received: from nag-j.co.jp (bvdeuz19.secure.ne.jp [180.222.80.19]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12F763571BA for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2016 02:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 29944 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2016 09:16:58 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO FujiMaru10) (malcolm@nag-j.co.jp@114.146.165.244) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2016 09:16:58 +0900 Message-ID: <00972E427DA042A2B9FDD2B8E86A933E@FujiMaru10> From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "WG5" References: <20161007115324.185453585FA@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20161007115324.185453585FA@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5790) 16-007r2 missing a paper from meeting 210 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 09:17:00 +0900 Organization: NAG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0842_01D22144.B978CC40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0842_01D22144.B978CC40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Reinhold, That there is no mention of it in the editor=E2=80=99s report means = there is no =E2=80=9CWhy=E2=80=9D, it just got missed out. Sorry about = that, and thanks for drawing it to my attention. Cheers, From: Bader, Reinhold=20 Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 8:45 PM To: WG5=20 Subject: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5790) 16-007r2 missing a paper from = meeting 210 Hello Malcolm,=20 =20 Looking at the most recent draft, it appears to me that 16-218r2 was not = applied. There is also no mention of it in the editors report. Why did it get missed out? =20 Cheers Reinhold =20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- _______________________________________________ ukfortran mailing list https://lists.accu.org/mailman/listinfo/ukfortran ------=_NextPart_000_0842_01D22144.B978CC40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Reinhold,
 
That there is no mention of it in the editor=E2=80=99s report means = there is no=20 =E2=80=9CWhy=E2=80=9D, it just got missed out.  Sorry about that, = and thanks for drawing it=20 to my attention.
 
Cheers,
 
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 8:45 PM
To: WG5
Subject: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5790) 16-007r2 missing a paper = from=20 meeting 210
 

Hello Malcolm,

 

Looking at the most recent = draft, it appears=20 to me that 16-218r2 was not applied. There is also no mention of=20 it

in the editors report. Why did = it get missed=20 out?

 

Cheers

Reinhold

 

 

_______________________________________________
ukfortran mailing=20 list
https://lists.accu.org/mailman/listinfo/ukfortran
------=_NextPart_000_0842_01D22144.B978CC40--