From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Jun 19 21:26:08 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 33CE4358287; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from smtp-out-1.tiscali.co.uk (smtp-out-1.tiscali.co.uk [62.24.135.129]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3FF356E4C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([212.139.77.201]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id EiM9bFGx4v713EiM9b0gDn; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:26:05 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [212.139.77.201] Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5727) [ukfortran] Units of measure To: WG5 References: <20160619135920.D0F3F358287@www.open-std.org> <20160619152210.F3FC0358759@www.open-std.org> From: John Reid Message-ID: <5766F1CA.8000300@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:26:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160619152210.F3FC0358759@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAp7Fi79+dffTVANJmu7C08JFNp6QFgVyzcZJae0flhrgjnxvo1YLDcq2yINzV539GwFQKJ+I+LbG6b/rwgT7XKq2Fm0PY4Vnyqd1Deo8IFy1H8G8I3N y0ZbW68UT/o/qBwdYaVur80MH3xItJL4c2rVzX4xeIFHJQq+HMjUnSUea87Y1BUxNKezcPlt+UkCBi+pDXqesKia5mGWB/tX6sY= Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Nick and WG5, N.M. Maclaren wrote: > I am not entirely happy about the following, as I think that it is too > negative. > > "While the sequence of events above describes a particular case where a > units checking package might have assisted with earlier notice of the > error, there did not appear to be wide-spread demand for this feature." > > I should prefer it if you were to add, after the last comma: > > "and other cases where such a feature would have been useful were > mentioned," I have made this change. John.