From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Jun 19 17:22:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id CF04A358287; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:22:10 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 1655 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:22:10 CEST Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A001F356E4C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:22:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:52242) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1bEe7L-000ant-iw (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path ); Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:54:31 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1bEe7L-0008Mn-TN (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:54:31 +0100 Received: from [84.51.142.87] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 19 Jun 2016 15:54:31 +0100 Date: 19 Jun 2016 15:54:31 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: John Reid Cc: WG5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5726) Units of measure Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160619135920.D0F3F358287@www.open-std.org> References: <20160619135920.D0F3F358287@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk I am not entirely happy about the following, as I think that it is too negative. "While the sequence of events above describes a particular case where a units checking package might have assisted with earlier notice of the error, there did not appear to be wide-spread demand for this feature." I should prefer it if you were to add, after the last comma: "and other cases where such a feature would have been useful were mentioned," Regards, Nick.